In this paper I deal with an unidentified manuscript held in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Münich 378
c, which is a chronicle covering 402-436H, namely the latter part of the Buwayhid dynasty. This manuscript preserves the content of the chronicle of Hilal al-Sabi, almost all of which has been lost, and has therefore been used in the study of Buwayhid history. Because it is an unidentified manuscript, its value as a source is diminished. In this paper I was able to determine the author and title of Münich 378
c, and in that process it became clear that there is a problem of the manuscript line of
Mir'at al-Zaman, and then I tried to organize this problem to.
In 1905 Amedroz examined Münich 378
c by comparing it with the manuscript of
Mir'at al-Zaman Or. 4619, but he came to no conclusion about the relationship. First, I reexamined his work, and I demonstrated the reason why he did not conclude that Münich 378
c is a manuscript of
Mir'at al-Zaman. Because, Or. 4619 is different from Münich 378
c with respect to contents and the number of articles.
Second, I compared Münich 378
c with manuscripts of
Mir'at al-Zaman preserved in libraries of Istanbul, for example the libraries of Ahmet III and Köprülü. Münich 378
c and the manuscripts of
Mir'at al-Zaman in Istanbul turned out to belong the same line of manuscripts. Namely, Münich 378
c is
Mir'at al-Zaman, and the author is Sibt b. al-Jawzi.
Finally, in this paper I showed that
Mir'at al-Zaman has two lines of manuscripts. Although this fact has been pointed out by Cl. Cahen and Li Guo, I demonstrated that problem of manuscript lines of
Mir'at al-Zaman is more complicated than heretofore realized.
抄録全体を表示