I engaged in production of TV programs of urban sociology as a professor of Open University of Japan 1997-2004. My first program was “Comparative Sociology of Urban Spacial Structure. " In my first lecture I discussed on M. Weber's method of “Nacherleben und Verstehen" and told that the program as a whole (15 lectures)shoud be a travel of Nacherleben of the development of urban sociology. Basemaps of Chicago by E. W. Burgess, W. Firey's three land use areas in Boston, city of Newberyport where W. L. Warner's “Yankey City" project took place, four settlements in Yucatan Peninsula which led Redfield to the folk-urban continuum, all appeared on air.
During this location activities I found another significance of program production. The first example was Hull House, the first settlement house in Chicago, where I found a detaild social map of a Chicago slum block that shows resident origin by each building. I was much impressed to discover myself that the work was done by settlement staff for practical purpose 30 years before concentric zone hypothesis by Burgess. Open University students could also “Nacherleben" my exciting experience of discovery. After many such experiences during location activities, I reached a concept somewhat like visual research.
I extended my work in my last program “Cities and Mankind" on the same concept. In the Symposium, the lecture 4, “Siena : feast and local residents association" was put on the screen.
Young proposed dicipline of visual sociology has many contoroversial problems two of which I mention as follows.
(1) Whether image is raw data or final product of study. In my sccial atlas project case, ratio of young/ old/ nuclear family / whitecollar workers and so on are the data, and they are categorized, verbal in character. After complicated process of K. S. method cluster analysis each of 2000 unit areas of Tokyo was asigned to 20 types of simmilar characteristics. It is the final product of social atlas, which is visual. Professor Ymanaka's seemless image would be in one sense data and and in another final outcome.
(2) How visual sociology could obtain reliability and validity which are important criteria for standardized sample survey? The criteria would be not the same as standardized sample survey. New criteria must be designed.
抄録全体を表示