We compare the theoretical excitation of surface waves and tsunamis by sources represented by single forces and double-couples. We first show that an average single force, whose orientation and exact depth are unknown, should excite any seismic wave proportionally to wavelength, relative to a similarly average double-couple, having the same source time function. Because of the condition of zero impulse on the whole planet, the spectrum of a single force source has an additional ω
2 factor at low frequencies. As a result, a general deficiency in long period energy is expected. However, we show on a number of examples that it can be observed only at the extreme low-frequency end of the spectrum of mantle waves, and probably would escape routine seismological observation.
We explore the possibility of identifying single force sources on the basis of single-station inversions of Love and Rayleigh waves, through the systematic inversion of synthetic spectra. Inversion of double-couple spectra for single forces (and vice versa) have variance reductions on the order of 70%, which may be too performant to allow discrimination under operational conditions, including noise and inaccurate epicentral distances. An important case is that of the pure dip-slip double-couple geometry on a purely vertical fault, which can be recognized from a single horizontal force, provided both Rayleigh and Love waves are used over a sufficiently broad range of frequencies. Previous controversy, notably in the case of the 1975 Kalapana, Hawaii earthquake, may reflect the use of band-pass filtered Love waves.
In the case of tsunami excitation, and because of the ω
2 term brought about by the condition of zero-impulse, single forces are significantly deficient tsunami generators, by as much as 1.5 orders of magnitudes, relative to a double-couple exciting comparable mantle waves. The enhanced tsunamis occasionally excited by events successfully modeled as single forces are due to the mechanical interaction of the source, whatever its nature, with softer layers in the vicinity of the surface.
View full abstract