The screening test on the urinary tract infection especially on chronic pyelonephritis was discussed.
1. Number of the urinary bacteria :
Whereas in the normal healthy persons the number was less than 10
3/ml., in the cases of pyelone-phritis the number over 10
5/ml, was marked in around 600 of the total observed cases, however the number less than 10
3/ml, was also tfound in about 10%; that seemed us that the number such with danger over looking the infection cannot be installed in an exact screening.
2. Urinary white cell excretion rate (W. E. R.) :
According to our own data and the literatures the overcounting than 40X10
4/hr was regarded as an abnormai, as the majority of cases was counted 20X10
4/hr, so in the cases of pyelonephritis W. E. R. sometimes showed normal and even the count less than 30 X 10
4/hr was noticed.
3. Provocation Test :
The provocation of pyrogen (TTG 50 gamma) or 40mg of predonisolone intravenous injection mostly brought the increase of W. E. R. among the cases of chronic pyelonephritis, while the W. E. R. of the normal control's did not. The rate before the provocation was usually amounting to over 40X10
4/hr but some cases had no increase or even showed a decrease, so that the method is not so trustworthy to screen the cases.
4. Urinary white cell concentration :
Little's method was allied. Discordance was however noted between the groups centrifuged and non-centrifuged, that required so much care in its manuplation, that it would be hardly considered as the simple method as Little originally mentioned.
5. On the so-called glitter cell :
Being dependent upon the urinary osmolarity, it is also uncertain.
So was the each method never complete for screening, unless the combination of the methods was attempted. Or rather, the general urological examination (endoscopical, roentgenological, & c.) should be carried out ; otherwise, there exists no perfect screening for the urinary tract infection.
抄録全体を表示