This study focuses on the urban planning theories by Toshikata Sano, Toshiro Kasahara, and Shigeyoshi Fukuda, who were responsible for drafting and passing the old City Planning Law and Urban Building Law. The similarities and differences among the three men were clarified as follows. The three men were mainly identified the shortage of housing, the density of building and people, and the size of building lots as urban problems. The solutions to urban problems included establishing zoning districts, unifying blcks, plots, and housing standards, introducing local planning, and building appropriate facilities to address the problems, as well as drawing and designing tangible plans. In terms of finances, plans for mass production of housing at low cost and specific budgets were established and planned. Regarding transportation, the construction of new railroads and roads was considered in conjunction with the creation of residential areas. Comparing the three, Toshikata Sano differed from the other two in that he did not see urban expansion as an urban problem. Also, compared to the other two, Toshiro Kasahara considered urban planning based on the zoning system. Shigeyoshi Fukuda was trying to shape the city with an emphasis on transportation planning. The results of the analysis show that the three men differed in their perceptions of urban expansion and in the scale of their solutions. However, architect’s theories of urban planning primarily focused on the layout of urban facilities and sought to formulate concreate urban plans by comprehensively examining a variety of factors, such as housing issues, building codes, transportation, and finance.
View full abstract