The concept of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) has been a subject of much controversy in USA. Professor Wilbourn argued that the rare true neurogenic TOS (TNTOS) presenting with the thenar atrophy is the only established disorder, and the other majority of patients who had been diagnosed as TOS, complaining various head, neck and arm symptoms without documented neurophysiological abnormalities, should be designated as disputed neurogenic TOS (DNTOS). Such a controversy has not been popularly known in Japan, and there have been few case reports of TNTOS patients, especially with detailed neuropysiological investigations.
In this study, we report clinical and electrodiagnostic features of 4 patients with TNTOS who were experienced at our institute for 12 years, and also presented the clinical features of 7 patients who were referred to the first author under the diagnosis of TOS from other doctors. Presenting symptoms of all four TNTOS patients were thenar atrophy or other motor symptoms. Two patients noticed mild sensory symptoms in the medial aspect of the forearm. Neurological examinations revealed the weakness of abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and ulnar-innervated small hand muscles to a lesser extent. The flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) muscle to the index finger was weak, but that to the little finger was preserved for all patients. All patients had objective sensory loss in the medial aspect of the forearm. Motor nerve conduction studies revealed severe decrease of the amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from the APB muscle and mild decrease of the CMAP from the abductor digiti minimi muscle for all patients. Sensory nerve conduction studies documented loss or severe depression of the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) from the medial antebrachial cutaneous (MAC) nerve and moderate decrease of the SNAP amplitude from the ulnar nerve and from the ring finger following the median nerve stimulation. Needle EMG, when examined, revealed greater involvement of the APB muscle than the first dorsal intereosseous muscle, and the C7-innervated muscles were normal. These electrophysiological results unequivocally indicated the lower trunk plexopathy that was dominant in the T1 components, which agrees with the localization documented for TNTOS by previous authors. The distribution of the weakness of present patients also revealed the T1 innervation of the median FDP muscles and the C8 innervation of the ulnar FDP muscles, which has not been reported previously. Among 7 other patients referred to the first author under the diagnosis of TOS, 5 showed evident hysterical weakness, and masked depression was evident in another patient. In this regard, these patients were thought to be classified under the category of DNTOS. The first author did not gave the final diagnosis of TOS to any other patient during the investigation period of 12 years. TNTOS is a rare disorder presenting with motor-dominant symptoms, and the electrodiagnosis clearly localizes the lesion at the T1-dominnant upper trunk for these patients. This concept should be strictly discriminated from the DNTOS, the presence of which is still controversial.
View full abstract