Recently, Melan-100 has been marketed as a simple inspection apparatus for the diagnosis of sudden acquired retinal degeneration in dogs. Although vision disturbance is observed in retinal diseases such as sudden acquired retinal degeneration and inherited retinal degeneration, pupil light reflex is usually unaffected. In this study, Melan-100 was clinically assessed using 54 eyes that were suspected of or had vision impairment in 27 dogs showing pupil light reflex.
The eyes were examined by menace test/dazzle test, and according to the results, the dogs were divided into 4 groups as follows: Group 1, +/+; Group 2, -/+; Group 3, -/- Group 4, +/-. The eyes examined with Melan-100 were evaluated and classified into 3 categories depending on their response: “Normal,” “Abnormal,” and “No response.” “Normal” was defined as complete pupil constriction wherein the observed pupil diameter was less than 4 mm in response to red and blue light; “Abnormal” was defined as incomplete pupil constriction wherein the pupil diameter was less than 4 mm in response to blue light alone; “No response” was defined as absent or decreased pupil constriction wherein the observed pupil diameter was above 4 mm in response to red and blue lights.
Of the 27 dogs, 25 were of any of 12 breeds and 2 were mixed breeds. “Abnormal” and “No response” eyes were present in all the groups. Fourteen eyes (14 of 23, 60.9%) in Group 1, 6 eyes (6 of 17, 35.3%) in Group 2, 8 eyes (8 of 12, 66.7%) in Group 3, and 1 eye (1 of 2, 50.0%) in Group 4 were classified as “Abnormal.” Three eyes (3 of 23 13.0%) in Group 1, 10 eyes (10 of 17, 58.8%) in Group 2, 4 eyes (4 of 12, 33.3%) in Group 3, and 1 eye (1 of 2, 50.0%) in Group 4 were classified as “No response.” Although the dazzle reflex was observed in Groups 1and 2, the number of eyes that were classified as “Abnormal” in Group 1 and the number of eyes that were classified as “No response” in group 2 were high. None of the eyes in Groups 3 and 4 were classified as “Normal.” Most of the examined eyes had suffered from cataract and retinal diseases. Thirteen of twenty-five cataractous eyes (52%) were classified as “Abnormal”; this number was very similar to that for eyes with retinal diseases (14 of 25 eyes, 56%). None of the eyes with retinal diseases were classified as “Normal,” but some of the cataractous eyes were.
Therefore, our results showed that Melan-100 may be useful for the evaluation of retinal photoreceptor function in dogs with cataract as well as retinal diseases, provided they showed pupil light reflex.
View full abstract