Diet/exercise is the first choice for treating diabetes, while medications are considered for inadequate glycemic control. Biguanides (BGs) are considered as the first-line agents in the USA; in Japan, however no first-line therapy has been designated. We were interested in the current use of BGs and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in Japan, as well as the differences in prescribing practice between specialists and general practitioners (GPs). Accordingly, we undertook a questionnaire survey on antidiabetic medications among physicians in Tokyo. The survey was performed between January and June 2013. It included questions to physicians regarding the following: (1) current diabetes treatment; (2) first-, second-, and third-line antidiabetic drugs for 4 hypothetical patients (Case 1: 56-year-old woman, body mass index (BMI) 23.9, HbA1c 7.2%; Case 2: 56-year-old man, BMI 26.0, HbA1c 7.2%; Case 3: 56-year-old man, BMI 22.9, HbA1c 8.5%; and Case 4: 67-year-old man, BMI 23.9, HbA1c 8.5%); and (3) first-, second-, and third-line countermeasures for deterioration of HbA1c. The responses were compared between specialists and GPs. Question 1 was answered by 1,086 physicians (collection rate: 85.5%), including 290 diabetes specialists and 796 GPs. Insulin was more commonly prescribed by specialists (30% vs. 8%). Both groups used an HbA1c of 7% for initiating drug therapy. Regarding Question 2, BGs were most commonly prescribed by specialists for non-obese patients with a relatively good HbA1c, whereas DPP-4 inhibitors were prescribed by GPs. Both groups used low-dose sulfonylureas as third-line therapy and commonly selected DPP-4 inhibitors as first-line therapy for Cases 3 and 4. Interestingly, specialists tended not to choose low-dose sulfonylureas for patients with poor glycemic control. Regarding Question 3, the main first-line countermeasure was “confirming compliance with diet/exercise,” followed by “adding metformin.” Tokyo specialists favored BGs even for patients with relatively good glycemic control, whereas low-dose sulfonylureas were less common. GPs used DPP-4 inhibitors more often than specialists.
View full abstract