At present, there truly different opinions exist on whether or not permanent residents are members of the country where they reside and, if so, to what degree. In Japan, whether the right to vote should be granted to permanent residents has in recent years been one of the key constitutional issues and more and more commentators think that permanent residents are eligible to vote, at least at the local election. However, as far as the national election is concerned, the majority of the commentators still deny the right to vote of permanent residents on the grounds that sovereign power resides in the people. By contrast, permanent residents of New Zealand have been qualified to vote not only at the local but also at the national election since 1975, if they have resided continuously in New Zealand at least for a period of one year and in the electoral district at least for a period of one month. In the meantime, New Zealand government celebrated the 50th anniversary of the emergence of the concept of 'New Zealand citizenship' in 1998 and emphasize that a measure of a nation's maturity is the strength and depth of the country's national identity and that one of the most important aspects of their national identity is the nation of New Zealand citizenship. This paper examines why New Zealand grants the right to vote to permanent residents without citizenship even at the national election. The author concludes that whether permanent residents should be qualified to vote depends on their resolution to reside permanently in the country and have deep commitments to the future of the community. If they do have the above resolution, the level of election, national or local, is irrelevant. New Zealand's experience shows us the truth.
抄録全体を表示