TThe purpose of this study is to recognize irrational reasoning strategies in physics problem solving process toward reconciliation of scientific concept and discrepant procedurdl knowledge. The aim is to enhance students' reasoning ability not by accretion of physics knowledge, but by training metacognitive function to keep the reasoning protess rational. 22 subjects who are all physics major college students taking a secondary science teacher training course participated in interview test. Every two subjects, totally 11 pairs, tried six physics problems concerning 'balancing' through discussion among subjects. We have an procedural knowledge that the balance beam should get horizontally when the products of the weight and the distance from fulcrum in each side are equal. It has discrepancy from the view of physics, however. To solve the six problems correctly, they have to understand the role of the physics concept 'center of mass'. How they will reason these problems? Main findings are ad follows: (1) Since most subjects, though they are physics majors, had believed the procedural knowledge undoubtedly, changing the mind was very hard for them, or not happened. (2) The process of reasoning are often the means-ends analysis in which the goal is decided before reasoning start to find the thinking route backward. (3) In order to protect their beliefs, solvers used various irrational reasoning strategies such as obeying 'a priori' proposition, making 'ad hoc' proposition, using analogies, compromising, claiming nonsense, maintaining theoretical consistency, and distorting physics principle. (4) The social interaction among solvers through discussion could be used to drive the reasoning process not only rational, but also irrational.
抄録全体を表示