Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to global health, economic growth, and development. AMR in the livestock industry is one of the key issues because the large amounts of antimicrobials (AMs) are used to maintain animal health and productivity. Therefore, research and studies have been conducted in Japan, to develop various countermeasures against AMR in livestock sector.
Livestock manure is treated as waste or preferably used as fertilizer and/or ameliorant in agricultural fields. Nevertheless, in the “One Health” approach, such animal wastes are currently considered as an interface of AMs and antimicrobial resistant bacteria (ARB) between livestock industries and the environment. In contrast to European countries and China, research on AMs and ARB in livestock manure is meager in Japan.
Japanese swine farms have been used about 60% of total veterinary AMs sold and annually discharged about 22 million tons of manure (30% of total livestock waste). Swine manure in Japan is mainly treated under aerobic condition (wastewater treatment and composting), which is distinct to other countries, where mainly use an anaerobic condition. In addition, types and amounts of AMs and their usage patterns depend on each country. Such differences may affect the residual levels of AMs and ARB in manure-based end-products. In the light of the above, we are interested to understand the residue levels, fate and environment release of AMs and ARB in wastewater treatment and composting processes by conducting in situ monitoring in 11 Japanese swine farms and lab-scale experiments.
AM concentrations in untreated swine wastewater were from below method detection limits (<MDL; sub µg/L) to several mg/L and were found to be related to purchase quantities. The estimated removal rates of AMs were greater than 80%. In contrast, on a few occasions, it was diminished due to failing operating conditions, such as water temperature and activated sludge rate in the aeration tank. In addition to these two factors, aeration rates/times greatly affected the AM removal rates in lab-scale experiments. Likewise, some AMs could be removed well, if flocculation was done before the primary wastewater treatment process. The estimated ecological risks of AMs in effluents based on risk quotients considered to enhance the selection pressure for antimicrobial resistance were high for tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones, whereas ecotoxicological effects to aquatic organisms were relatively higher for sulfonamides and macrolides. The antimicrobial resistance rates in Escherichia coli isolated from wastewater did not change during treatment processes. However, total coliform counts were decreased noticeably, especially during the membrane separation method. These results indicate that flocculation before primary treatment and water-temperature controlled membrane bioreactor are effective methods of swine wastewater treatments for reducing the environmental release of AMs and ARB.
AMs in swine manure composts were detected at concentration ranging from <MDL (sub µg/kg on dry wt.) to 15 mg/kg. Unlike the case of wastewater, these concentrations were not related to purchase quantities of AMs but were affected by the removal efficiencies of AMs depending on composting methods. AM removal rates in open-type composting (pile-type and windrow-type) were high and constant, compared those in enclosed-type. Escherichia coli was not isolated from most of the swine manure composts, due to elimination during composting.
Since 2000, AMR studies associated with treatment of livestock manure and their effects after applying to agriculture fields are becoming new research topics and thus still there are lot of knowledge gaps. Our group is trying to bridge these gaps and suggest appropriate management of livestock manure.
抄録全体を表示