The effects of H
1- and H
2-antihistaminics on acid secretory response by histamine were studied by means of continuous pH recording of proventricular effluent in urethane anesthetized chickens. The birds were operated for artificial respiration, vagotomy and instillation of physiological saline solution. The esophagus just under the crop was cannulated with a silicone rubber tubing (4 mm in outer diameter). Another polyethylene cannula (5 mm in outer diameter) was inserted into the proventriculus through the proventricular-gizzard junction. A flow-type pH glass electrode was placed at right angle to the proventricular effluent at extra abdominal cavity. A diluted sodium hydroxide solution of 5×10
-4 or 1×10
-3 N was perfused into the esophagal cannula by means of Manostat cassette pump and the pH of effluent emerging from the proventricular cannula was recorded graphically. In most of the experiments, basal pH records of effluent ranging from 9-10 were obtained by introducing 5×10
-4 N sodium hydroxide solution into the proventricular lumen at a flow rate of 12 ml/min. In some experiments, a basal pH level ranging from 5-7 was recorded when 5×10
-4 N sodium hydroxide solution was introduced at a flow rate of 2.4 ml/min. In all the above cases, the pH of effluent rapidly decreased following the administration of histamine (10μg/kg, i.v.). The time course of the pH fall could be divided into two phases, a transient and a lasting ones. The transient phase was not inhibited by metiamide 0.4 mg/kg (i.v.), an H
2-antagonist, or by diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/kg (i.v.), all H
1-antagonist. The lasting phase was blocked almost completely by the H
2-antagonist, but only partially by the H
1-antagonist. The results suggest that two histamine receptors are involved during the acid secretion in the chicken.
View full abstract