ガス体の寸法および形とその黒度との関係を調べるために,円筒形ガス体の高さhと直径Dの割合を0.5, 1, 2, 5と変えて,その側面,底面および全面に対する平均黒度を求め,またHottelのいわゆる“相当厚さ”を求めるときにガス体の代表長さDに乗ずべき係数をあわせ示した。Hottelは円筒に対してはh/D=1,∞に対してだけ係数を与えているが,その値はkD(kはガスの吸収係数)がほぼ1の場合に正確で,kDが4の場合にこの値をそのまま用いると約5%の誤差を生じる。形が黒度に及ぼす影響は,h/Dが0.5から1に増加する場合はかなり著しいが,h/Dがさらに大きくなると急速に無限円筒の黒度に近づき,h/Dが5の場合と無限円筒の場合の黒度の差は8%以内である。
また輻射線束が円筒形ガス体の側面から側面へ,側面から底面へ,底面から側面へ,底面から底面へ到達する場合の到達面に対する平均ガス体黒度(すなわち円筒形周壁のある面から出た輻射が他の面または自分自身に到達する前に内部に充満しているガスに吸収される割合の到達面に対する平均値)をも求めた。底面から出た輻射が他の面へ達する際の平均ガス体黒度は,h/Dが0.5-5の範囲ではh/Dが小さくなるほど大きくなる¹⁴⁾。

抄録全体を表示

The object of the report is to explain the result of the investigation on a new rotational oscillating viscometer with coaxial two cylinders designed by the authors. Coefficient of viscosity η of liquid under test is obtainable from the logarithmic decrement λ of the damped oscillation of the inner hollow cylinder suspended by a steel wire of small diameter from the upper block, which is so contrived as to be kept in the fixed position by being pulled with a magnet during the test. The inner cylinder has no bottom plate but contains liquid in it, which also gives a resistance against rotation of this cylinder.
As seen from the relation between λ and the dipped height of the inner cylinder in liquid, the end effect of this apparatus is negligibly small as compared with that of the ordinary viscometer of rotating cylinder type with a bottom plate.
The relation λ vs. η is recognized to be straight in the region, η>1 poise, but it deviates from the straight line where the viscosity is as low as η<1 poise. Usually we can apply this viscometer to the measurement of viscosity in the wide range of η above 1 poise. Even when the viscosity is low, -η<1 poise-, it may be used keeping the sensibility of 0.1 centi-poise by setting a torsion wire of smaller diameter, although in this case it does not give the linear relation between λ and η as before.

抄録全体を表示

The presence of a set of rigid particles in a Newtonian liquid raises the viscosity of the liquid to a value η_s which is higher than the viscosity η₀ of the liquid itself. The nondimensional ratio η_s/η₀, which is known as the relative viscosity η_r of the suspension, might be a function of the fraction of the total volume of the suspension φ_v comprizing the particles.
The most widely known expression for η_r, first obtained by Einstein, has the form of the equation 1. But this equation does not agree with the experimental results except for the case in which the concentration is very dilute. So many theoretical relationships, derived by Guth, Simha, Vand, Brinkman and others, for higher concentration, however, do not agree with the observed data in the range higher than 8-10 volume percentage, either. Now, Robinson considered that the specific viscosity in higher concentration was not only proportional to the volume fraction of solid, but to the reciprocal of free liquid volume fraction, and obtained the empirical equation in Table 1.
Taking into account this consideration by Robinson and the observation by Bingham that the particles in the same stratum had the same velocity and did not change their mutual distances, the following theoretical relationship for the relative viscosity of general suspension system has been derived by the authors.
(16)'
where, d is the effective average diameter of particles, Sr is the volume specific surface, φ_v is the volume concentration and φ_vc is the limiting concentration at the full-packed state, where steady flow can occur without any deformation, fracture or grinding of particles.
From this formula, the physical meanings of the two empirical constants k and S' in Robinson's equation can be explained as follows:
in which, k is a function of particle shape, whose value becomes 3 for spherical particles, φ_vc, the limiting concentration, may be a function of particle shape and its size distribution.
In a special case when the suspended particles are spherical and have equal size, the obtained formula becomes as follows, provided the value of φ_vc is assumed to be equal to 0.52, which is the volume fraction of solid in cubic packing of spheres of equal size.
This formula agrees quite well with the observed values given by different writers over a wide range of concentration as shown in Figure 4. Figure 6 indicates the systematic variation of relative viscosity with changes in the relative fraction of large and small spheres in the suspensions. The plotted data are the experimental values by Eveson, Ward and Whitmore for the suspensions consisting of methyl methacrylate polymer spheres in an aqueous lead nitrate-plus-glycerol solution. The real lines are the theoretical results calculated by means of the equation (16)', using Furnas chart, Figure 5, for φ_vc. According to the equation 16, when 1/_ηsp is plotted against 1/φ_v on condition that and 1/φ_v are constants, the graphs must be linear, and its intercepts are equal to 2/d·S_r and 1/φ_vc respectively. All the data reported were examined and they proved to agree approximately with this consideration as shown in Figs. 9-15. It is especially interesting to note that in Figure 14, the value of φ_vc is approximately equal to the concentration of the cake produced in the centrifuge.

抄録全体を表示