Although the underflow concentration of a continuous thickener can be calculated by Roberts' equation,
5)(22)
the constant,
kR, has to be determined by the batch settling experiment for each slurry in question. The experiments conducted by Comings and his collaborates
3) revealed that the underflow concentrations of a continuous thickener are affected not only by the retention time in the compression zone (as Roberts states) but by the height of the zone. Therefore, the Roberts' constant may be expressed in terms of the pertinent properties of the slurry as well as its initial height.
A fundamental equation for the compression stage in the batch settling of well-dispersed slurries whose initial concentration is the critical one at which the compression stage begins, has been derived. The void fraction of any portion of the slurry is assumed to become its equilibrium as soon as the pressure is exerted on the portion.
where has been linealized toandis defined.
The fundamental equation is solved for the initial and boundary conditions (13-16), to get a generalized batch settling equation, for the compression stage, in the form of
(19)
(20)
(21)
Using these equations and the result of batch settling experiment for one appropriate initial height, the batch settling curve for other initial heights can be predicted with considerable accuracy (Table 2).
Roberts' constant,
kR, can be expressed in terms of
cv+ and the initial height of the slurry, as folliows,
(25)
where
cv+ represents the characteristics of the slurry, and consists of two parts, viz. the equilibrium relationship ε
*=
f(
ps+) and the modified permeability which can be measured by the compressionpermeability tester and by one batch settling experiment, respectively. (Table 1 & 2). Since
cv+ is dependent of H0, the product
kRH0 is approximately constant.
From the analysis made for the batch settling of slurry, the relationships among the depth of the compression zone, the underflow concentrations, the retention time and the underflow rate of a continuous thickener is expressed by a set of equations,
(29)
Fig. 7, 8 and 9 are the samples of the relationships calculated from the set of Eqs. (29). When comparing the lower right portion of Fig. 8 with Comings' graph (Fig. 10), we can observe the essential similarity between them, though the values are not equal, due to the difference of samples employed.
View full abstract