In a practical fire fighting situation, there is a possibility that different foams will be applied to a tank fire in series or simultaneously by a fire brigade.
This report was to determine the compatibility of two different foams when applied to an acetone or isobutanol fire simultaneously through two nozzles by gentle surface application. This report also considers the effectiveness of a single foam on such fires.
Comparative performance was judged by the extinction time, fuel vapor sealability and burnback resistance of the foams.
A fluorochemical foam (polymeric gel forming type), when it is applied to fires involving polar solvents, greatly reduced the extinction time compared to a polar-solvent type fluoroprotein foam used alone. But the fluoroprotein foam has better resistance in the reignition (burnback) test compared to the fluorochemical foam used alone.
When the fluoroprotein foam is used with the fluorochemical foam, there was a definite decrease in the extinction time compared to when the fluoroprotein foam is used alone.
Foams generated separately from polymeric gel and fluoroprotein are compatible and can be applied together on fires involving polar solvents.
View full abstract