It hasbeen reported by ISHIKAWA and HIRAO (1963) that among three seneilla styloconica of the maxillary lobe of silkworm larva two longer ones have quite different contact chemoreceptors from each other, one being called sugar sensory hair and the other water sensory hair. The former responds to sucrose, inositol and salts, while the latter seems to be excited by repellent substances, water and some kinds of salts.
This finding let us to examine the functional differentiation of the two sensory hairs of a “nonpreference” mutant which cannot discriminate other plant leaves from mulberry. The mutant was obtained by TAZIMA, one of the authors, in 1953 after X-irradiation. It is controlled by a single Mendelian dominant gene which is associated with a recessive lethal. The mutant stock has been maintained for about 20 generations by sibling heterozygotes or
inter se. Both normal and mutant types segregate in the same batch of this stock in every generation.
The response of the receptors in the two sensory hairs has been recorded electrophysiologically for both mutant and normal by stimulating with several water soluble extracts of plant leaves and some pure chemicals.
No noticeable difference have, however, been found between the normal and mutant for both hairs. Furthermore, in both type individuals no positive response was observed to isoquercitrine, which according to HAMAMURA
et al.(1962) is an attractant of this insect.
Two possibilities might, therefore, be considered regarding the loss of food-preference in this mutant:
1) Functional abnormality in the central nervous system, because no abnormality has been revealed for two sensory hairs in this mutant so far as the present experiment is concerned, or alternatively;
2) Abnormality in the sensory organs for other functions than those tested in this experiment.
View full abstract