The department where the author belongs has begun to re-consider the ambiguous and multifaceted term “kyosei”, which is a part of the name of our department, in a broad context from a personal physical to a broader cultural level. In 2009 it held a series of symposia and meetings aiming towards reconstruction of a comprehensive concept of “kyosei” (tentatively defined as “living together harmoniously”). This article describes the outline of our discussion, highlighting key concepts and actual activities of students. First, “kyosei” in Japanese was found difficult in translating into one English word: neither “symbiosis” nor “coexistence” was too simple-minded. Our department finally adopted, as a part of its name, the English word “wellbeing” to encompass our diverse concerns, thus the symbol our department became “W”. Second, while “kyosei” was too glorified historically, particularly in the wartime, it was stressed that we should be careful to its negative compulsive nature, and that “kyosei” should have its roots to “life”. Third, it was suggested that the academic system dealing with “kyosei” could not be constructed only under the name of “-ology”, or strictly logical scientific thoughts. This discussion reminded us of the concept of “mode 2” knowledge production as opposed to “mode 1” only by experts (Gibbons et al., 1994) and the “Neurath’s boat”, the image conjured up by Neurath (1921), which cannot be reconstructed afresh and must be repaired endlessly on the open sea. These associations further reminded the author of activities of inexpert students, triggered by problem-focused environments. The students, who could have been at a loss if the group had consisted of only the scientific experts, dived into some application context with little knowledge of experts, and were consequently forced to think how to work by themselves as a unique “micro-culture”. The academic staff have often found that the students would develop their potential more when they were left alone in the application context, but still enjoyed their own action and were acknowledged by others, than when they were taught systematic scientific knowledge first. Examples of such student activities are presented in this article to show that they, as inexpert members, can create and successfully maintain their “Neurath’s boats”. These activities also suggest that our “kyosei” goals could be brought about by conviviality, which would be probably the most adequate English word for “kyosei”. If we would like to lead our students to mature citizens who can achieve true “kyosei” ideals, most probably we must utilize application contexts.
View full abstract