Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
Online ISSN : 2185-0453
Print ISSN : 0386-9644
ISSN-L : 0386-9644
Search
Advanced search
OR
Browse
Search
Current issue
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
Show all abstracts
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
Editorial
  • Advancing the Japanese Medical Education Journal: Academic Evolution and the Significance of Submission Guideline Revisions
    Yuko Takeda, Takuya Saiki, Michio Shiibashi, Hiroshi Nishigori, Makoto ...
    2025 Volume 56 Issue 2 Pages 87-98
    Published: April 25, 2025
    Released on J-STAGE: April 28, 2025
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.56.2_87
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    The role of academic journals evolves with the times. Academic publishing is diversifying, shifting from traditional paper-based formats to broader dissemination through open access. In response to these developments-and to contribute to ongoing progress in medical education-Medical Education (Japan) has undertaken a comprehensive revision of its submission guidelines. As of January 17, 2025, all submissions, peer reviews, and editorial processes are being conducted in accordance with the updated guidelines. 　The Editorial Board convened a round-table discussion to explore recent developments, beginning with the revision of the submission guidelines. This discussion elaborates on the journal's role and its relevance to the academic community, including society members, authors, and readers. It features statements from participating editorial committee members and highlights the key issues discussed, including the criteria each member uses to evaluate manuscripts. The aim is to offer insight into the journal's editorial stance and decision-making process.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (812K)
Original Research Papers
  • The Relationship Between PhD Research Experience and Clinical Competency of Physicians
    Hiroki Aoki, Makoto Kikukawa
    2025 Volume 56 Issue 2 Pages 99-112
    Published: April 25, 2025
    Released on J-STAGE: April 28, 2025
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.56.2_99
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    Background: The lack of clarity regarding the significance of engaging in research activities during a clinical career has been identified as a contributing factor to the trend of decreasing research involvement among young physicians.　Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted within a clinical department of a private university to investigate physicians' perceptions of the correlation between research experience and clinical competency.　Results: Quantitative analysis of survey data indicated that physicians acknowledge the contribution of research activities to their clinical competency. Qualitative data revealed subjective perceptions among participants regarding these contributions.　Conclusions: This study highlights that physicians recognize research activities as an opportunity to enhance their clinical competency. Clarifying the relationship between research activity and clinical competency is expected to support the development of more effective research programs aiming at improving physicians' clinical competency.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (1094K)
Review Articles
  • Utilization of Generative AI in Research and Academic Writing in Medical Education: A Practical Approach from Research Planning to Manuscript Preparation
    Hajime Kasai
    2025 Volume 56 Issue 2 Pages 113-123
    Published: April 25, 2025
    Released on J-STAGE: April 28, 2025
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.56.2_113
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    In academic research and writing, generative artificial intelligence (gAI) is becoming an increasingly useful tool. gAI can help researchers work more efficiently, think creatively, and manage different tasks throughout the research process. This review presents the basic functions of gAI and how it can be used in various types of research, including medical education research-from developing research questions and reviewing previous studies to analyzing data, writing drafts, proofreading, and translating texts. Understanding how these tools work and using them carefully can be greatly beneficial for researchers. For example, better results can be derived by using well-designed prompts and critically checking the gAI's output. However, important concerns also exist. gAI can sometimes produce information that sounds correct but is, in fact, wrong. Excessive reliance on gAI may also weaken important writing and thinking skills. In addition, questions concerning fairness, responsibility, and proper use need to be addressed. Clear rules and responsible use of gAI tools are essential. gAI should not replace human judgment or academic standards. However, if used thoughtfully, it can help improve the quality of writing and make research work more productive. It may also support researchers in Japan in sharing more of their work internationally. As medical education continues to develop, gAI has the potential to support better research practices-if it is used with care and a strong sense of responsibility.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (1023K)
Invited Papers
Letters to Editor
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
feedback
 Top