Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics
Online ISSN : 1880-6643
Print ISSN : 0031-126X
ISSN-L : 0031-126X
Volume 46, Issue 3
Displaying 1-2 of 2 articles from this issue
Full Papers
  • Toshimitsu Tsukakoshi, Akio Yoshida
    1995Volume 46Issue 3 Pages 56-66
    Published: 1995
    Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2006
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
       We obtained an analytical solution for the propagating strain wave in a two-layered Elsasser model in which the thickness of the lower visco-elastic layer increases linearly with horizontal distance. We investigated the characteristics of the strain propagation in the space-time domain and compared them with those of strain propagation in a two-layered model in which the thickness of the lower visco-elastic layer is constant (hereafter we call this the parallel two-layered model). Our model is considered more suitable to treat stress diffusion caused by an episodic change of coupling state between the oceanic and land plates at the subduction region. By assigning reasonable values to parameters in the solution, we get the propagation velocity of about 30km/year. The velocity is concordant with the observation. The propagation velocity is constant in our model, while it decreases with lapse of time or with distance from the source in the parallel two-layered model. This is the largest difference between the two models.
    Download PDF (676K)
  • Tatsuo Hanafusa, Makiko Kato, Shunji Takahashi
    1995Volume 46Issue 3 Pages 67-84
    Published: 1995
    Released on J-STAGE: October 20, 2006
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
       During the past decade, the Doppler Sodar (SOunding Detection And Ranging) has increasingly contributed to our understanding of the atmospheric turbulence over complex terrain through measuring wind speed and direction in a fundamentally different fashion from the traditional anemometer from the view point of volume mean.
       In this paper, the field data which were obtained by two Doppler Sodars (AR-410 type, Kaijo) installed over complex terrain were compared with the results of wind tunnel experiments and numerical simulations to see how representative are the values measured by Doppler Sodars over complex terrain.
       From these experiments, it is found that there are hardly any systematic errors caused by different measuring methods between mean wind speed values by anemometers and those by Doppler Sodars.
    Download PDF (1350K)
feedback
Top