Purpose: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) often involves proprioceptive deficits, but the influence of ankle joint alignment on proprioception during dynamic tasks remains unclear.
Methods: 20 university students (12 with CAI, 8 controls) performed a stepping-down task onto a tilting platform that presented four inversion angles (10°, 12°, 14°, 16°) across three ankle joint alignments: inversion (INV), plantarflexion-eversion-abduction (PEB), and dorsiflexion-inversion-adduction (DID). Area under the curve (AUC) scores represented proprioceptive discrimination ability. Two-way mixed ANOVA compared AUC scores across groups and alignments, while Pearson’s correlation examined relationships between Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) scores and AUC.
Results: No significant differences in AUC scores were found between CAI and control groups (p=0.33). However, a significant main effect for ankle joint alignment was observed (p<0.01), with higher AUC scores in the DID alignment compared to PEB alignment (p<0.05). A moderate positive correlation between IdFAI and AUC scores was found only in the CAI group under PEB alignment (r=0.61, p=0.035).
Conclusion: Ankle joint alignment significantly influences proprioceptive discrimination, with better performance in dorsiflexed positions. The absence of group differences suggests that proprioceptive impairments in CAI may be influenced by task-specific demands and centrally mediated adaptations. These findings highlight the importance of considering joint alignment when designing proprioception assessments and rehabilitation interventions, and the need to standardize proprioception assessment methods in both clinical and sports settings.
View full abstract