The present investigation was undertaken to determine the kinetics of eosinophils and basophils in allergic reactions, the Rebuck’s skin window technique with the specific antigens being used. And the same procedures with known chemical mediators and histamine liberator were utilized on the non-allergic individuals in order to see which mediator was the most responsible to each cell dynamics.
1. Atopic hypersensitivity
Significant eosinophilia was seen in each preparation (Table 1). However, no basophilia was observed.
2. Delayed hypersensitivity
a) Response to streptokinase
By intradermal injection of 40 units/ml streptokinase saline solution (diluted from Varidase) beneath the denuded area, considerable basophilia was seen at late period in each subject (Table 2).
b) Response to tuberculin (PPD)
Moderate eosinophilia and basophilia were noticed in the preparation at 48 hours obtained from tuberculin-sensitive persons by the same procedure above-described (Table 3).
c) DNCB-contact allergy
As shown in Table 4 and Fig. 1, within first 24 hours, significant eosinophilia was observed in most specimens, then it decreased. Basophils began to accumulate at 24 hours, and this response intensified at 48 hours.
In this experiment the skin window technique was done on the chronic dermatitic lesion induced by 24-hour patch of 0.2 % DNCB aceton solution 10 days ago. And prior to performance of skin window technique, the same agent was reapplied on the lesion for 2 hours. Thereafter, the skin window was made on the site with a drop of saline.
3. Response to chemical mediators and compound 48/80
By the topical application of 20
μl of each agent, it was revealed that serotonin creatinine sulfate (15 %), acetylcholine (1 %), norepinephrine (1 %), kallikrein (40 units/ml), trafuril (1 %), prostaglandin El (0.1 %) and prostaglandine E2 (0.1 %) had no chemotactic activity for both eosinophils and basophils. Histamine phosphate brought about weak eosinophil-chemotaxis only when 10 % solution was used.
On the other hand, 1mg/ml compound 48/80 saline solution was able to cause significant eosinophilia in the skin window preparations (Table 5). These results suggested that eosinophilia seen in allergic reactions could be induced by histamine liberation, not by histamine itself. Basophilic response was characteristic in delayed hypersensitivity. This may show the mobilization pattern of basophils from the blood vessels in order to make up the mast cells depleted by long-lasting degranulation stimuli.
View full abstract