Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Online ISSN : 1349-8029
Print ISSN : 0470-8105
ISSN-L : 0470-8105
Current issue
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
Special Topics
  • Takashi MORISHITA, Yuki SAKAI, Hitoshi IIDA, Hideaki TANAKA, Galih I. ...
    2024 Volume 64 Issue 8 Pages 289-298
    Published: August 15, 2024
    Released on J-STAGE: August 15, 2024
    Advance online publication: June 19, 2024
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

    Tourette syndrome (TS) is a developmental neuropsychiatric disorder that is characterized by tic movements. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be a treatment option for severe cases refractory to medical and behavioral therapies. In this study, we reviewed the surgical techniques used for DBS in patients with severe TS and its clinical outcomes and sought to determine the optimal surgical procedure and current issues based on our experience and the literature. A total of 14 patients, consisting of 13 men and 1 woman, who underwent centromedian thalamic DBS and were followed up for a mean duration of 2.3 ± 1.0 years, participated in this study. The mean Yale Global Tic Severity Scale severity score significantly improved from 41.4 ± 7.0 at baseline to 19.8 ± 11.4 at 6 months (P = 0.01) and 12.7 ± 6.2 at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). Moreover, the mean Yale Global Tic Severity Scale impairment score significantly improved from 47.1 ± 4.7 at baseline to 23.1 ± 11.1 at 6 months (P < 0.01) and 7.6 ± 2.9 at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). However, there were problems with continuous postoperative monitoring (three cases were lost to follow-up) and surgery-related adverse events, including one case each of lead misplacement and a delayed intracerebral hemorrhage due to severe self-injurious tics. This study aimed to highlight not only the clinical efficacy of DBS for TS but also its challenges. Clinicians should understand the three-dimensional brain anatomy so that they can perform precise surgical procedures, avoid adverse events, and achieve favorable outcomes of DBS for TS.

    Download PDF (1053K)
  • Ryota TAMURA, Masahiro YO, Masahiro TODA
    2024 Volume 64 Issue 8 Pages 299-308
    Published: August 15, 2024
    Released on J-STAGE: August 15, 2024
    Advance online publication: June 19, 2024
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    Supplementary material

    NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2; previously termed neurofibromatosis type 2) is a tumor-prone disorder characterized by development of multiple schwannomas and meningiomas. The diagnostic criteria of NF2 have been regularly revised. Clinical criteria for NF2 were first formulated at the National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference in 1987 and revised in 1990. Revised criteria were also proposed by the Manchester group in 1992 and by the National Neurofibromatosis Foundation (NNFF) in 1997. The 2011 Baser criteria improved the sensitivity of diagnostic criteria, particularly for patients without bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Revisions to the Manchester criteria were published in 2019, with replacement of "glioma" by "ependymoma," removal of "neurofibroma," addition of an age limit of 70 years for development of vestibular schwannomas, and introduction of molecular criteria, which led to the most widely used criteria. In 2022, the criteria were reviewed and updated by the international committee of NF experts. In addition to changes in diagnostic criteria, the committee recommended the use of "schwannomatosis" as an umbrella term for conditions that predispose to schwannomas. Each type of schwannomatosis was classified by the gene containing the disease-causing pathogenic variant. Molecular data from NF2 patients led to further clarification of the diagnostic criteria for NF2 mosaic phenotypes. Given all these changes, the diagnostic criteria of NF2 may be confusing. Herein, to help healthcare professionals who diagnose NF2 conditions in the clinical setting, we review the historical development of diagnostic criteria.

    Download PDF (1320K)
Original Articles
  • Nobuyuki SAKAI, Satoru FUJIWARA, Kazutaka UCHIDA, Koji IIHARA, Hirotos ...
    2024 Volume 64 Issue 8 Pages 309-315
    Published: August 15, 2024
    Released on J-STAGE: August 15, 2024
    Advance online publication: June 05, 2024
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    Supplementary material

    We reported the main results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4, a nationwide surveillance of therapy (NET) in Japan from January 2015 to December 2019. JR-NET 4 registered consecutive patients who underwent NETs by Japan Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) -certified specialists. The primary endpoint was functional independence (mRS score of 0-2) at 30 days post-NET, with secondary endpoints focusing on technical success and major adverse events within 30 days.

    A total of 63,230 patients and 60,354 NET procedures from 166 participating centers were analyzed. During the study period, NET cases have consistently increased, with an increase in the proportion of elderly patients. A significant trend shift was observed in the distribution of NET procedures, with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke that showed a dramatic increase in 5 years. This trend aligns with key randomized clinical trials from 2015 that presented the efficacy of this treatment. Clinical outcomes at 30 days posttreatment revealed that endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke and other NETs maintained safety and effectiveness despite varying prevalence of functional independence between target diseases. The study also observed a steady increase in emergency treatment cases, reflecting the increase in acute ischemic stroke, a time-sensitive medical condition.

    This comprehensive surveillance highlights the trend of NET practices in Japan, driven by clinical evidence and advancements in treatment devices. Although these findings were specific to Japan, they offer valuable insights into the broader trends in NETs and acute stroke care.

    Download PDF (381K)
  • Saki KAWAMOTO, Tomohiko OZAKI, Katsunori ASAI, Tomoki KIDANI, Nobuyuki ...
    2024 Volume 64 Issue 8 Pages 316-322
    Published: August 15, 2024
    Released on J-STAGE: August 15, 2024
    Advance online publication: June 19, 2024
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

    There is a lack of data regarding the safety and effectiveness of implanting the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield technology (PED-Shield) compared with the previous generation of Pipeline (PED-Flex). This retrospective single-center study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between the PED-Shield and PED-Flex for treating unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms. The PED-Flex was used in 62 procedures (67 aneurysms, 59 patients) and the PED-Shield in 53 procedures (59 aneurysms, 58 patients). The mean aneurysm diameter was significantly lower in the PED-Shield group than in the PED-Flex group (11.9 ± 7.0 mm vs. 15.2 ± 6.9 mm, p < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, the complete angiographic occlusion rate was 72.1% and 72.3% in the PED-Flex and PED-Shield groups, respectively (p = 0.9808). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 70.6% and 68.0%, respectively (p = 0.8175). The incidence of more than three high signal intensity areas on diffusion-weighted imaging after treatment was significantly lower in the PED-Shield group than in the PED-Flex group (27.7% vs. 67.7%; p < 0.001). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 41.1% and 69.6%, respectively (p < 0.0117). Symptomatic ischemic complications occurred within 30 days of four PED-Flex procedures (6.5%) and one PED-Shield procedure (2.0%) (p = 0.2315). Limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm, 1.8% and 3.2%, respectively (p = 0.6677). The incidence of mRS score worsening at 6 months was 3.2% and 1.9% in the PED-Flex and PED-Shield groups, respectively (p = 0.6534). The PED-Shield can achieve outcomes equivalent to or better than the PED-Flex. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

    Download PDF (241K)
Editorial Committee
  • 2024 Volume 64 Issue 8 Pages EC15-EC16
    Published: August 15, 2024
    Released on J-STAGE: August 15, 2024
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    Download PDF (55K)
feedback
Top