In economics, “economies of scale” is one of the basic ideas, which means that larger production leads to cost reduction. This logic lends itself well to rice farming, whose cultivation process is highly mechanized. However, in apple farming, which involves a number of manual processes, it is said that profitability is not increased by enhancing productivity. Therefore, it is also believed that middle-sized apple orchards are more productive and profitable than large ones.
After the last half of 1980s, some labor-saving technological changes were introduced in apple farming. The aim of this study was to confirm whether middle-sized apple orchards still have the highest productivity and profitability in spite of those changes, based on research conducted in Souma Village, where the average orchard size managed by one family farm is the largest in Japan.
The following results were obtained. First, we divided the target orchards into five types: “under 1 ha,” “1~2 ha,” “2~3 ha,” “3~5 ha,” and “over 5 ha.” Of these, the 3~5 ha orchards have the highest productivity and profitability. Regarding management characteristics, it was clarified that in the 3~5 ha orchards, the reliance on hired workers is greater, whereas the reliance on labor-intensive work is less. Furthermore, only the 3~5 ha orchard farmers can make a living by producing apples only.
As we can regard 3~5 ha as middle-sized, we conclude that middle-sized orchards are superior to the orchards of other sizes, and the farmers of those orchards will be the core apple farmers in the future.
View full abstract