We have enforced prophylaxis of PE, DVT since in January 2007. In this paper, we describe the results and problems of survey of prophylaxis for inpatient venous thromboembolism (VTE). Materials and Methods: Survey of prophylaxis of VTE for newly hospitalized patients went into effect in January and October 2007 and in October from 2008 to 2012 (total 2751 patients). Prophylaxis (elastic stocking, intermittent pneumatic compression and anticoagulant) put into practice as instructed risk level (low, moderate, high and very high) in the ward including intensive care unit and operation theater. We also provided further consideration on nosocomical cases. Results: Inpatient average rates of risk levels in the wards, except for operation theater during 7 years were 25.3% (low), 32.1% (moderate), 7.2% (high), 1.6% (very high), 33.8% (not indicated), respectively. Rates of not indicated patients decreased by 14.0%, but became a rising trend after 2010. Average rates for each preventive method were 49.3% (elastic stocking), 22.0% (intermittent pneumatic compression) and 10.7% (anticoagulant), 36.6% (not indicated). On the other hand, in operation theater, that of risk levels were 28.2% (low), 39.2% (moderate), 12.5% (high), 5.4% (very high), 14.7% (not indicated), respectively. Average rates for each preventive method were 74.7% (elastic stocking), 61.2% (intermittent pneumatic compression) and 5.7% (anticoagurant), 9.6% (not indicated). Twenty-six inpatients with VTE who were treated with thrombolytic therapy using IVC filters were introduced by neurosurgery and neurology patients following prolonged bed rest. General and thoracic surgery in patients with cancer were second largest. On another front, the number of severe VTE cases belonging to orthopedics and gynecology were relatively little. Half of them (14 inpatients, 53.8%) were treated with no prophylaxis. In recent years, numbers of suspicious VTE patients have increased and in each department. Results of thrombolitic therapy were acceptable. Conclusion: To increase the average rate for prophylaxis, it is very important to simplify the preventive procedure and produce changes in the way of thinking by the doctors and staff. Furthermore, diagnosis of preoperative DVT will be a subject of future investigation.
View full abstract