Chances for the non-profit sector (specifically NPOs) to participate in the policy process are increasing with public budget pressures and a wave of civic participation. The role of NPOs is being sought not just in policy implementation, but in all phases from proposal to evaluation. In this climate, the accountability of NPOs involved in public policy is an important issue, and is considered herein on the occasion of the promulgation of Japan’s Government Policy Evaluation Act (GPEA). This paper discusses NPO accountability with a focus on areas newly open to their policy evaluation.
NPO accountability may be examined from two perspectives: one based on the evaluation process and the other on the system, organization, and activity patterns of the given NPO. In the former, the object, contents, and nature of accountability varies depending on what stage (s) the NPO is involved in, while in the latter they vary according to the organization’s public benefit, management skill, and the subjectivity and freedom of will of the personnel and backers both at the time of establishment and during subsequent activities. In both cases, factors such as the aggressiveness (or lack thereof) or activeness (or lack thereof) of involvement and stance will determine the contents, nature, importance, and degree of accountability.
Thus, diverse accountability exists for NPOs involved in policy evaluation. In spite of occasional conflicts caused thereby, taking on diverse accountability (the object, contents, and nature of which vary) allows the validity of NPO involvement in policy evaluation to be guaranteed and the rationality of the result of that involvement to be secured.
View full abstract