品質
Online ISSN : 2432-1044
Print ISSN : 0386-8230
42 巻, 1 号
選択された号の論文の10件中1~10を表示しています
特集
  • 細谷 克也
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 6-13
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    In order to accomplish management objectives, they must be made certain and efficient by identifying true assignments that need to be prioritized, by clarifying measures to achieve them, and by putting them into implementation. This justifies the significance of Policy Management. In this article, I'd like to describe the necessity of Policy Management, to define what Policy Management is, and to expand upon the purpose and outcome of Policy management. A careful, step-by-step description of the procedures is also introduced. Finally, ten key points are proposed by which to proceed with Policy Management effectively. This article will provide you with specific procedures for effective Policy Management.
  • 荒井 秀明
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 14-18
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    When carrying forward a quality management system, policy management is activity which works on preponderantly in TQM. When top management do business, strategic management policy is hung up, management policy is sent to all the employees from top management, and each operating department draws up the activity plan in alignment with that policy, and puts into action. The example that Komatsu has aimed at improvement of physical condition by policy deployment as Komatsu's strong point is introduced.
  • 齋藤 純一郎
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 19-22
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    The declaration to challenge the Deming Prize brought about a drastic change in our policy management. While our conventional policy management merely aimed to accomplish goals, the current one is giving importance not only to goal achievement but also to how we foster middle management executives and how we accomplish business goals. I would like to introduce actual examples of our efforts for them.
  • 栄永 昌幸
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 23-29
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    There were several events history to be current policy management of Meidoh in the past. It is explained that activities which is the most important for the current system. Policy management had been started in 1987, when company tried to be certified Toyota quality award. It was necessary to be install policy management in order to keep good quality. Huge time and man power lead making outline of policy management. The policy management made increase sales amount and profit ratio. It was learned the policy management is very important to lead company direction and to make company grown. When the next high target was set by top management, company decided to challenge to be certified TPM award. In this activity, it was concreted Meidoh's basic KAIZEN culture. "TOP Tenken (Top management checks kaizen activities on-site)," "Kaizen Kaihatsu happyou (Improvement activity and development presentation)," and "Soui Kufuu Teian(Suggestion system)." All employees suggest 10 improvements every month and it has been achieved the target many years. In recent years, environment of economic situation has been changed quickly. So the policy management has to be reviewed to improve. In 2010 company challenged Deming prize to measure TQM activity in recent years, and company had been awarded Deming prize. This was not our goal. Meidoh is aiming No.1 in Fastener business. It will able to be achieved if the policy management is brushed up.
  • 武石 健嗣
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 30-39
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    In 1981, "GQM," which is described as TQM at GC, was introduced in order to adapt to any environment and establish flexible and strong corporate base, and in 1995, GC has started the "Vision Management" as one of most important strategies of the company management. It is not too much to say that our "HOSHIN KANRI" has been largely contributed to achieving our vision. "Presidential Diagnosis" is an unique feature of our company to enhance HOSHIN KANRI. It is implemented 50 times throughout a year, which reinforces the favorable PDCA cycle.
  • 鈴木 北吉, 藤井 暢純
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 40-44
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    We have practiced policy management and continuously turned PDCA through various management activities in order to have the policy management taken a firm hold on our organizational culture as the most critical, basic factor of Quality Management in our company. Management environment is dynamic ; but, policy management is universal. Therefore, it is imperative for us to seriously practice STQM which reinforce policy management by enlightening and perpetuating its substance.
  • 猪原 正守
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 45-49
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    In this paper, we discuss policy management and provide concise summaries of issues and resolutions from view points of leadership development and management. It is reaffirmed the significance of management points and management by facts through subjective and/or objective analysis conducted by reporters, and shown that daily management is one of the most critical success factors.
  • -いま不確定な時代だからこそ,方針管理を-
    猪原 正守, 福丸 典芳, 上田 和弘(仮名), 坂本 毅郎(仮名), 小山 大輔(仮名)
    原稿種別: 特集 『デミング賞受賞企業における方針管理の発展と課題』
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 50-57
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
論文誌編
報文
  • 佐野 夏樹, 黒木 学
    原稿種別: 報文
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 127-138
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    統計的非対称判別分析法として,マハラノビス・タグチ(MT)法が提案され,品質管理や医療診断の現場で利用されている. MT法の有用性が事例をとおして実証されつつあるなかで,単位空間に属するデータが楕円状に分布していない場合や項目間に高い相関がみられる場合には, MT法によって適切な判別を行うのは難しいといった問題点が指摘されている.本論文では,この問題を解決するために,新たな非対称判別分析法として,宮川・永田(2003)によって提案されたMT汎距離とカーネル法を融合させた「カーネルMT法」を提案する.また,数値実験と適用例をとおして, MT法, SVM, 1クラスSVM, カーネルMT法の性能を比較し,カーネルMT法の有用性を示す.
  • 水関 裕人, 黒木 学
    原稿種別: 報文
    2012 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 139-147
    発行日: 2012/01/15
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル 認証あり
    本論文では,興味ある2値の要因系変数Xと品質特性Yを含む分割表データが与えられている状況を考える.この状況において,Xを含む説明変数集合からYへのロジスティック回帰分析を行うことを考える.このとき,第3の説明変数Zの追加・除去によってXからYへの回帰係数の値が変わらないための条件は併合可能条件と呼ばれ,すでにいくつかの既存研究がある.これに対して,本論文では,Zの追加・除去によってXからYへの回帰係数の符号が変わらないための十分条件を与え,これが正規線形回帰モデルにおける十分条件とは異なることを示す.また,興味のある回帰係数の推定精度の観点からこの十分条件を考察し,Zを解析に取り入れることで推定精度が低下することを示す.
feedback
Top