Objectives: Beryllium is primarily used in its metallic form, in alloys, or in beryllium oxide ceramics. Its physical and mechanical properties make it useful for many applications across a range of industries. Because beryllium is recognized as a sensitizing and carcinogenic agent, the management of occupational health for workers who may be occupationally exposed to beryllium has long been an important issue in the world. Under these circumstances, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) had published a rule in January 2017, to prevent the development of chronic beryllium disease and lung cancer. This rule strengthens the regulations governing the use of beryllium and its compounds. With the announcement of the OSHA rule in January 2017, the purpose of this study is to gain insight into the health problems and industrial hygiene associated with the use of beryllium and share the issues related to the management of occupational health for persons working with beryllium in Japan. Methods: We collected information regarding the beryllium industry, beryllium exposure, beryllium-induced health disorders, OSHA rule of January 2017, and regulations for beryllium use in Japan. After reviewing them, we discussed the issues concerning occupational health management of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan. Results: It has been reconfirmed that in recent years, the most serious health problem due to beryllium exposure is chronic beryllium disease caused by beryllium sensitization. Management of occupational health that emphasizes reduction of beryllium sensitization and early detection of beryllium-sensitized workers is important. Conclusions: It was suggested that the following should be considered as the issues of management of occupational health of workers exposed to beryllium in Japan: (1) Collect epidemiologic data on health hazards from beryllium exposure in Japan. (2) Review the diagnostic items of special medical check-ups. (3) Review the definition of beryllium and its compounds in the Ordinance on Prevention of Hazards due to Specified Chemical Substances.

Objectives: The current status of home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is unknown at a Japanese worksite. We aimed to calculate the proportion of individuals who periodically measured HBP and to explore the demographic and lifestyle characteristics of these workers. Methods: The study included 4,664 employees aged 40–65 years who worked at a retail company and underwent health check-ups in 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of participant’s demographics and lifestyle characteristics and habits for HBP measurement by sex and medical treatment for hypertension. Periodic HBP measurement was defined as HBP measurements performed two times or more per month (opportunistic HBP measurement) among participants not being treated for hypertension, and daily measurement of HBP (everyday HBP measurement) among participants treated for hypertension. Results: The percentages of opportunistic HBP measurement were 8.7% in males and 12.4% in females not being treated for hypertension. In both sexes, age (ORs per 1-year increment: 1.11 in males and 1.06 in females) and blood pressure (ORs of ≥ 140/90 mmHg: 7.42 in males and 4.71 in females compared with < 130/80 mmHg) were positively associated with opportunistic HBP measurement. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR: 1.77), who had a self-described fast walking speed (OR: 1.49), and who exercised habitually (OR: 1.79) had significantly high ORs for opportunistic HBP measurement. Females who frequently consumed snacks after dinner had significantly lower ORs (0.65) than those who did not. The percentages of workers who did everyday HBP measurement were 21.6% in males and 25.5% in females treated for hypertension. Males treated for diabetes (OR: 0.23) had significantly lower OR than those who did not. Females treated for dyslipidemia (OR was 0.53), who had uncontrolled hypertension (OR: 0.58), consumed alcohol (OR: 0.60), and frequently ate within two hours before bed (OR: 0.54) had significantly lower ORs. Females who lived alone had significantly higher ORs (2.43) than those who did not. Conclusion: Approximately 10% of individuals not treated for hypertension periodically measured HBP. Age and blood pressure in males and females, and healthy lifestyles in females, were associated with having opportunistic HBP measurement. Approximately 25% of individuals treated for hypertension measured HBP every day. Individuals treated for dyslipidemia or diabetes and females with unhealthy lifestyle and uncontrolled hypertension were less likely to measure HBP every day.

Objectives: In Japan, companies are required to implement a “stress check program” to prevent mental health problems in workers. To identify “high-stress” workers, the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) is recommended. According to the stress check program manual issued by the government, high-stress can be defined using two criteria, either the “sum method” (simply summing the scores for each scales) or the “score converted method” (using converted scores according to the conversion table for each scales). In this study, we examined the differences in results found using these two criteria on “stress check program” data. Methods: We used data of 71,422 workers in 117 companies and organizations who conducted stress checks in 2016. The prevalence of high-stress was calculated by applying the two criteria simultaneously, and the chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of workers with high-stress. We subsequently divided participants into the four following groups and calculated the proportion of each group: group A was defined as having high-stress by both criteria; group B, only by the sum method; group C, only by the score converted method; and group D, not defined as high-stress by either criterion. We compared the average values of stress response among four groups using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and further compared the average values between group B and group C using the Bonferroni method. Results: The average age of participants was 43.7 ± 11.1, and 66.8% were males. The proportion of those defined as having high-stress were 11.7% using the sum method and 13.2% using the score converted method; the proportion of high-stress workers was thus significantly higher when using the score converted method (p <.001). Physical stress response was higher in group B; however, lack of vigor, irritation, fatigue, and depression were higher in group C (p <.01). Conclusions: Compared to the sum method, 1.5% more high-stress workers were observed using the converted method, and this result was similar for individual and employment-related factors. Furthermore, workers were more likely to be judged as having “high-stress” when the score of the physical stress response was higher in the sum method. Hereafter, it is important to consider which criteria are applied when discussing proportions of high-stress. Further research is needed to examine which criteria will predict health disorders.