東南アジア -歴史と文化-
Online ISSN : 1883-7557
Print ISSN : 0386-9040
ISSN-L : 0386-9040
1974 巻, 4 号
選択された号の論文の10件中1~10を表示しています
  • 白石 愛子
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 3-41
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
    This is a historical analysis of the origin of the Indonesian National Army (Tentara Nasional Indonesia, TNI), which plays an important role in the present Republic of Indonesia. More concretely, the purpose of this paper is to consider the historical meaning and character of Jawa Booei Giyuugun (Fatherland Defense Force of Java), which, at a later stage, became the basic source of the power of TNI.
    Jawa Booei Giyuugun, generally called PETA (Tentara Pembela Tanah Air) in Indonesian, was a group of native troops organized in late 1943 by decree of the commander of the Japanese 16th Army, occupying Java at that time, and compelled to mobilize native power for it war effort. At first it recruited native youths as supplementary soldiers (Heiho) of the Japanese Army the course of time it became clear that only Heiho could not supply sufficient native support. Japanese military authorities then planned to form a volunteer Army consisting of only natives. In the occupied area of Southeast Asia this plan was first proposed in July 1943, by General Inada, Deputy Chief of the General Staff of Nanpoo Soo-Gun (Southern Area Armies), and it was accepted by Dai Hon Ei (General Headquarters).
    Prior to this, some Indonesians had already had a strong desire to be armed in order thus to obtain military training in preparation for the future struggle for independence. The Japanese Army in Java took advantage of this atmosphere and by skillful means forced a nationalist politician, Gatot Mangkupradja, to submit a petition for the formation of an Indonesian volunteer army. Thus the decree of the 16th Army commander, ordering the formation of PETA, was issued “in order to respond to the strong desire of the Indonesian people.”
    From late 1943 until the surrender of Japan, 69, Daidan (battalion) of PETA were organized throughout Java, Madura and Bali. Each battalion consisted of about 500 members, all Indonesian, with Japanese officers attached as instructors (Shidoo-kan). The Japanese officer had a big say in battalion affairs.
    There were only three ranks of PETA officers: Daidan-choo (equivalent to major), Chuudan-choo (equivalent to captain) and Shoodan-choo (equivalent to lieutenant). The Shoodan-choo were particularly important because later this group formed the core of TNI officers and had a leading role in the struggle for independence that took place from August 1945.
    Under the Japanese Occupation PETA officers assisted in giving military training to Indonesian youths. Semi-military organizations such as Hizbullah were also organized with the help of PETA officers. Through these opportunities PETA members had secret contacts with the youth groups (including underground groups) in the Indonesian society.
    My conclusion is that PETA was not a simple puppet army of Japan but played an important role in the struggle for independence, and in real sense PETA formed the basis for the present TNI.
  • 特にペイヤーの編年について
    青柳 洋治
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 42-60
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
    Until 1950 Henry O. Beyer (1947, 1948) was the only archaeologist active in the Philippines. By this time he had a general theory of Philippine prehistory based on his own excavations and surface collections from all over the Philippines and comparative studies of archaeological sites and relics from neighbouring countries. His chronological framework was classified into five ages: Palaeolithic, Methalithic, Neolithic, Iron and Porcelain Ages. While his works are valuable. as. a general introduction to Philippine prehistory, they can not be regarded as reliable until they are tested by extensive excavation, since Beyer's chronological frame work is based on pure guesswork.
    Archaeological research moving beyond Beyer began in 1950 when Wilhelm G. Solheim, Robert B. Fox and Alfred E. Evangelist initiated their Philippine field work. The work of these men produced new data and interpretations somewhat at variance with Beyer's conclusions.
    The most intensive and significant work ever done in the Philippines was carried out recently by Fox (1970). For the Tabon Caves on Palawan, Fox has established the first reliable chronology for any area of the Philippines. His chronology is supported by fourteen radiocarbon (C14) data. He has classified Philippine prehistory into four ages: Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Metal and Proto-Historic Ages. Other important articles are Solheim (1964, 1968), and Fox and Evangelista (1957, a, b); largely concerned with jar burial assemblages, they represent contributions to the analysis and description of Philippine pottery. Other relevant materials (Fox 1959, Locsin 1968) are of basic value for any study of Chinese ceramics. I think that recent archaeological work in the Philippine has revealed the following:
    1. Flake-tool Culture should be placed in the late Palaeolithic Age.
    2. Beyer's “Jar-Burial Cultures” should go back to the late Neolithic Age. Also, the fist Philippine potteries should be placed in the late Neolithic Age.
    3. The Iron Age Culture was transmitted tow or three groups of people.
    4. The first Chinese porcelain came to the Philippines around the 12th century
  • 1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 60
    発行日: 1974年
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 西北タイ山地民族調査より
    白鳥 芳郎
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 61-71
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 喜田 幹生
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 72-82
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 赤木 攻
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 83-99
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 桜井 由躬雄
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 100-122
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 営坂 正昭
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 123-127
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 市川 健二郎
    1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 128-130
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 1974 年 1974 巻 4 号 p. 131-142
    発行日: 1974/11/13
    公開日: 2010/03/16
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top