All issues
Volume 36, Issue 7
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|
-
[in Japanese]1995 Volume 36 Issue 7 Pages 457-463
Published: July 25, 1995
Released on J-STAGE: September 30, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (2102K) -
[in Japanese]1995 Volume 36 Issue 7 Pages 464-470
Published: July 25, 1995
Released on J-STAGE: September 30, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (835K) -
[in Japanese]1995 Volume 36 Issue 7 Pages 471-480
Published: July 25, 1995
Released on J-STAGE: September 30, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (9380K) -
[in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese]1995 Volume 36 Issue 7 Pages 491-494
Published: July 25, 1995
Released on J-STAGE: September 30, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (490K) -
Tamiko Yamada, Yoshiko Nakazato, Hitoshi Akami, Jungkwon Suh1995 Volume 36 Issue 7 Pages 495-501
Published: July 25, 1995
Released on J-STAGE: September 30, 2010
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSThe measurements of the drape coefficient were carried out by the drape tracer built as a trial. The basic constructions of the drape tracer were three arms and three joints equipped with encorders. In this experiment, the fabrics are mainly used whose difference in flexural rigidity per weight, EI/w, between warp and weft directions is within 200. The drape area changed linearly with increasing the bending length, 3√EI/w. Also the drape coefficient showed similar to those of drape area. When the flexural rigidity per weight, EI/w of each fabrics was similar, drape coefficient, nean of deflection angle, and π number, each of them were obtained considerably similar values. On the other hand, when the flexural rigidity per weight, EI/w of each fabrics was different, the scale factor, k2 which was obtained from mean of deflection angle agreed well with the scale factor, k1 which was obtained from cantilever method.View full abstractDownload PDF (725K)
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|