-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
Cover1-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
Cover2-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Yukiyoshi HOTTA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1621-1658
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
This article tries to identify the formation process and historical background of proscriptions on character usage (kinji-horei 禁字法令) in the rules and regulations concerning samurai given names (jitsumyo 実名) in the Sendai clan. There were no laws of this kind until the later part of the 17th century in Sendai, but Tsunamura 綱村, the 4th lord, began to promulgate laws that forbid all vassals of the Date伊達family to use certain characters. Such prohibited characters were kanji that the members of the Date family used as parts of their names. Yoshimura 吉村, the 5th lord, forbade the use of 宗, which was the kanji that the successive heads of the Date family had used in their given names; then finally several characters that the members of the Date family were using and that their ancestors had used were forbidden all together. It was in this way that the leading family of Sendai was ranked as special by forbidding the "desecration" of names related to the Date family. The creation of such laws is closely connected with not only the qualitative shift in the relationship of master to servant, but also the relationship between feudal lord and his vassals in the Date clan.
View full abstract
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1658-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Yuko MATSUZAKI
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1659-1682
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
The agreement between Korea and Japan dated August 22, 1904 prescribed that the Korean Government consult the Japanese Government before dealing with such diplomatic affairs as the grant of concessions to or contracts with foreign nationals. The convention between Korea and Japan, dated November 17, 1905, stipulated the measures regarding the execution of the treaties actually existing between Korea and other powers, but lacke provisions related to the execution of agreements and/or engagements already existing. This leads ut to the assumption that there was some adjustment procedure for the concessions already given to foreign nationals in the policy framework of the residency-general. This article takes up the case of the Kapsan mining concession granted to the American firm of Collbran and Bostwick and discusses the following points. First, the characteristics of the Kapsan concession in its form, terms and the attached instruments are compared with other concessions. The emperor of Korea granted the concession to the American firm, hoping that it might induce some diplomatic assistance from the United States. Secondly, the imperial black seal order was issued frequently to the American firm from the middle of 1900. Although the seal was originally used in affairs regarding personal/ private imperial household property, it was utilized by the foreign powers in obtaining concessions. For that purpose the logic that the authority of the emperor of Korea was the ultimate source of legitimacy in the Deahan Chekuk was employed. Next, Japanese authorities regarded the Kapsan concession as the most serious hindrance to enforcing the Mining Law promulgated on July 12, 1906, because of its terms and possibility to induce international discord. Finally, U. S.-Japan negotiations nullified the original Kapsan concession (which was alleged to be legitimate by the Americans in the name of the Korean imperial prerogative) granted a new concession, and agreed to revise the Mining Law so as to secure the original terms of the Kapsan concession. By such procedures, the conditions to uniformly enforce the Mining Law were met. As shown in the case of Kapsan concession, one of the meanings and functions of the period of the Japanese protectorate over Korea lies in the adjustment of foreign interests contradictory to Japanese policy.
View full abstract
-
Toshiaki IMAZU
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1682-1705
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
The purpose of this article is to show adjustment to the party rules by the leaders of the Kenkyukai, which was a party in the House of Peers, and influence of their activities on the political situation under the first WAKATSUKI Reijiro cabinet. By passing its act of manhood suffrage in 1925, the Japanese House of Representatives received firmer legitimacy. It was expected that party-led governments would continue, but that rebutted political action by the House of Peers. In particular the members of the Kenkyukai needed their legitimacy, because they had lost legitimacy on due to their coalition with the KATO Tomosaburo cabinet and KIYOURA Keigo cabinets, which were blamed for being partyless. Then KONOE Fumimaro advocated that the House of Peers should defer to the cabinet based on a majority in the Lower House. This seemed to be adequate for recoverring their legitimacy at first glance, but it was impossible to put into practice very easily, since there was no party with an absolute majority in the House of Representatives at that time and the parties were bickering among themselves. So the leaders of the Kenkyukai tried to form a majority in the House of Representatives by stabilizing the tumult, hoping that popularity and legitimacy would result from their action. At first they supported WAKATSUKI's government and tried to make it join hands with Seiyuhonto. But they suddenly began to blame the government for its maladministration in October in 1926. The turn of the front office of Kenkyukai tipped the scale.
View full abstract
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1705-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Keiichi HARADA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1706-1711
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Junji BANNO
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1712-1721
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1722-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1722-1723
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1723-1724
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1725-1726
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1726-1727
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1727-1728
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1728-1729
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1729-1730
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1730-1731
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1731-1732
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1732-1733
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1734-1750
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
1754-1751
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
App1-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
App2-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
App3-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
Cover3-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 112 Issue 10 Pages
Cover4-
Published: October 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: December 01, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS