Purpose: Root canal preparation was performed on the maxillary lateral incisor having a complicated root canal morphology, although it is a single root canal, by using the instruments for a dental engine, and a study was performed for analyzing the efficiency and the aspect of the cutting surface.
Methods: 20 pieces of human extracted maxillary lateral incisors were classified into four groups, and root canal preparation was performed by using a small Ni-Ti WaveOne file and a RECIPROC R25 file, and an ERT file made of stainless steel as the instruments for the dental engine, and a K-file made of stainless steel as a hand instrument. In addition to the measurement of working time required for cutting, the cutting ratio and cutting quantity of the root canal wall were calculated, and the aspect of the root canal cutting portion was analyzed. Further, the root canal was observed with an SEM.
Results: Working time was as follows: 34.3 seconds with WaveOne, 58.4 seconds with RECIPROC, 250.0 seconds with ERT file, and 825.0 seconds with K-file for the hand. The cutting ratios on the route canal wall surface were: 79.6% with ERT file, 78.8% with RECIPROC, 78.4% with WaveOne, and 58.1% with K-file for the hand. In the cutting quantity of the root canal wall, 2.7 mm
3 with ERT file, 2.5 mm
3 with K-file for the hand, 2.3 mm
3 with RECIPROC, and 1.6 mm
3 with WaveOne. In the case where an Ni-Ti instrument was used, the instrument could closely fit the complicated root canal morphology, and a non-cutoff site was not found at the end of the root canal or on the concave surface of the root canal wall. In all cases, when all of the instruments were used, there were the where sites no cut off was enough. In the cases where Ni-Ti instruments were used, remainders were seen, which seemed to be the degenerated dental pulp. For all of the instruments, a smear layer was found on the root canal wall surface after the cutting.
Conclusion: In the cases where Ni-Ti WaveOne and RECIPROC were used, root canal preparation could be achieved within a short time. Also, a higher cutting ratio was attained in the case where the instrument for a dental engine was used when compared with the case where hand instruments were used, showing the results of efficient cutting. However, in the cases where WaveOne and RECIPROC were used, by which the cutting could be completed within a shorter time, due to the solving and the removal caused by the use of hypochlorite sodium solution, solving and removal had to be carried out for removing the organic substance layer on the wall surface, which were not resected.
View full abstract