Introduction : Disease-specific scales for myelopathy, such as the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, have been used to describe the treatment outcomes of spine surgery. However, these scales are not sufficiently adequate for measuring quality of life (QOL), the improvement of which is essential for patients suffering from symptoms caused by cervical spondylosis, an aging-related non-life threatening disorder.
Methods : Patients with cervical spondylosis were prospectively evaluated using the Medical Outcome Scale 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as well as the JOA score, both before and after decompression surgery.
Results : In 102 patients with cervical spondylosis, both mental health and physical health subscales of the SF-36 were significantly lower compared with the normal population, although both modalities improved after surgery. Patients who underwent anterior fusion surgery tended to have more radiculopathy, but showed significant improvements in bodily pain and other SF-36 subscales related to mental health. In contrast, patients who underwent laminoplasty had more severe physical dysfunction, and postoperative improvement was more prominent in the SF-36 subscales related to physical health. Further, patients with better preoperative vitality showed better outcome in subscales of bodily pain, social functioning, general health, and mental health.
Conclusion : The SF-36 is a useful tool for assessing QOL in patients with cervical spondylosis, and can be used for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
View full abstract