The accuracy of differential diagnosis for malignancy was compared between
67Ga scintigraphy and sialoscintigraphy using
99mTcO
4-, and both scintigraphies in salivary gland tumors were combined.
The study cases were 34 salivary gland tumor patients who underwent both
67Ga and
99mTcO
4-scintigraphies; salivary gland tumors were confirmed histopathologically. The patients were 23 males and 11 females, ranging in age from 16 to 79 years (mean age: 54. 1 years). There were 17 patients with parotid gland tumors and 17 patients with submandibular gland tumors (20 benign tumors, 14 malignant tumors).
Four grades were used to categorize the
67Ga accumulation in the salivary gland with the reference uptake: negative(no accumulation), weak(< opposite gland), medium(<liver of the whole body scan and >nasal cavity), and severe (>liver).
By using
99mTcO
4- scintigraphy, the salivary gland function was classified into three different types according to stimulatory selection ratio which was expressed as the ratio of pre-to post-stimulation counts on the salivary gland, namely, normal type, lower functional type, and no functional type. Then the normal type was judged as normal function, and the lower and the no functional type were judged as abnormal function.
In
67Ga scintigraphy, the positive ratio of the malignant tumors was 85.7 %, and the positive ratio of the benign tumors was 65.0%. All tumors showing severe accumulation of
67Ga citrate were malignant.
In salivary gland function, 78.6% of malignant tumors were of abnormal function type. On the other hand, 90.0% of benign tumors were of normal function type. There was a significant difference between malignant tumor and benign tumor in salivary gland function(p<0.001).
In the differential diagnosis of salivary gland tumors, the accuracy or
67Ga was 0.56 and the accuracy of
99mTcO
4- was 0.85. However, the accuracy of the combined studies of
67Ga and
99mTcO
4- scintigraphies was 0.88.
The results suggested that combined studies on
67Ga. and
99mTcO
4- scintigraphies are useful in distinguishing malignant salivary gland tumor from benign salivary gland tumor.
View full abstract