analysis (FIA). The pyrolytic method is rapid and simple as compared to the standard distillation method (CAJS I-51) specified by the Japan Cement Association. However, the pyrolytic method presented consistently higher values than those obtained by the distillation method. The purpose of this study was to identify the cause of the difference between the results of pyrolytic method (pyrolysis F values) and those of distillation method (distillation F values), and validate the proposed method. A comparative experiment was carried out for the validation, applying the pyrolytic method to various cement raw materials including lime stone, silica rock, blast-furnace slag and gypsum, and evaluating the pyrolysis F values against the distillation F values. The pyrolytic and distillation methods presented similar F values for specimens not containing SiO
2. However, the pyrolytic method presented higher F values than those obtained by the distillation method for specimens containing SiO
2. The cause of this difference was found to be the silica gel (amorphous SiO
2) formed during the distillation process which was considered to decrease the volatilization rate of fluorosilicic compounds. The degree of the effect was dependent on the SiO
2 content and the specific surface area of silica gel. Furthermore, the distillation F values approached the pyrolysis F values when the distillation time was increased. The proposed method was found to be highly reliable. It was also rapid and simple, requiring only 15 minutes for pretreatment. Consequently, the proposed method is highly practical for routine quality control operation.
View full abstract