This study quantified CO
2 in various concrete binders and aggregates using back titration, thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTA), and the combustion-infrared absorption method, and examined the consistency among these methods along with error factors related to material characteristics. Back titration is considered the most appropriate method for both binders and aggregates because that directly measures CO
2, though sulfides pose a potential issue. In contrast, the TG-DTA method may underestimate or overestimate CO
2 due to the oxidation of sulfides in blast furnace slag, combustion of unburned carbon in fly ash, and dehydration of clay minerals in aggregates, which coincide with the temperature range for decomposition of calcium carbonate. The combustion-infrared absorption method may also produce inaccurate CO
2 values, as elemental or organic carbon within the aggregate particles can lead to overestimation or underestimation. In blended cement, sulfur compounds may interfere with infrared absorption, further skewing the CO
2 measurement. From these findings, back titration was identified as the most reliable method for CO
2 quantification in concrete materials. Understanding the specific characteristics of each sample and selecting the appropriate method is crucial for accurate CO
2 analysis in concrete materials and concrete structures.
View full abstract