In recent years, a wide variety of materials have been used in dental implant treatment. In selecting the superstructures and abutments to be used it is important to consider their potential effect on the stability and durability of the planned implant. Excessive force applied to an implant during maintenance commonly results in complications, such as fracture of the superstructure or abutment, and loosening or fracture of the screws. This report describes a case of implant treatment for a 23-year-old man with esthetic disturbance due to trauma to the maxillary anterior teeth. The left maxillary central incisor could not be conserved due to this trauma, which had been caused by a traffic accident. After extraction, the tooth was restored with an anterior bridge. The crown of the left maxillary lateral incisor was fractured at the crown margin and, at the patient’s request, implant treatment was selected as the restorative treatment for the missing tooth. A thorough preoperative examination was performed using placement simulation software. One titanium screw-type implant was placed in the maxillary left central incisor under local anesthesia. An all-ceramic crown with a zirconia frame was placed as a screw-fixed direct superstructure. At one year postoperatively, however, the superstructure and abutment became detached due to trauma. The fractured zirconia abutment was removed and replaced with a remanufactured abutment and superstructure. The patient has reported no subsequent dental complaint over the last 11 years. In this case, a surface analysis of the fractured zirconia abutment was performed. The scanned images revealed a difference in the fracture surfaces between the tensile and compressive sides, and electron probe microanalysis demonstrated the presence of titanium on the fracture surface. It was inferred that the hard zirconia abutment had scraped the titanium from the internal surface of the implant.

Cardiac ischemia, such as angina pectoris or myocardial infarction, is associated with pain in the oral cavity, lower jaw, head, or neck, or spanning from the left upper arm to the shoulder. When presenting to a dentist, however, appropriate treatment for such patients is often delayed, as dental problems are usually the first to be suspected when the chief complaint is orofacial pain. This report describes a case of a 70-year-old woman who was aware of pain and a burning sensation in the oral cavity upon exertion for a year prior to presenting at our clinic. She had been examined by her family physician, an otolaryngologist, and another dentist, none of whom found any abnormalities other than suspected periodontal disease and caries, for which she was treated. An examination at our clinic revealed no abnormal dental findings that would have been consistent with the mandibular pain, however. Although no chest symptoms were reported, pain was elicited on exertion, suggesting cardiogenic toothache. An immediate referral to a cardiologist was therefore made on the same day. The patient visited the cardiology department of the University Hospital of Tokyo Dental College 6 days later. The increased frequency of symptoms on exertion suggested unstable angina, and the patient was admitted to the emergency department on the same day. Emergency coronary angiography showed that right coronary artery #1 was 99% stenosed proximally (highly calcified plaque). The diagnosis was unstable angina pectoris, with the right coronary artery #1 as the responsible lesion, and percutaneous coronary angioplasty was performed on the same day. Subsequently, all the orofacial pain disappeared, confirming unstable angina as the cause. The pain characteristics in this case were consistent with pain associated with cardiac ischemia, which led to the immediate referral to the cardiology department. In cases of toothache associated with cardia ischemia, it is essential to seek cardiological care as soon as possible.

Although the working environment may play a role in dental acid erosion, few studies have been conducted on this in Japanese workers in recent years. The purpose of this study was to investigate oral health status, including dental erosion, in workers who may have been exposed to an acidic environment. The study participants were recruited by an online research company. Oral examinations and questionnaire surveys were conducted on this cohort in January 2023. A total of 144 participants were finally included. Workers exposed to an acidic environment showed more use of protective equipment and underwent more dental examinations at the workplace (p<0.001). Possible dental erosion was observed in only 3 out of the total of 144 participants (2.1%), however. No significant difference was observed in the number of teeth, caries experience, or dental erosion according to the number of years of acid exposure in the workplace. The results of this study suggest that acid exposure exerts a relatively small effect on the oral health status of workers in Japan.