Transactions of the Japan Academy
Online ISSN : 2424-1903
Print ISSN : 0388-0036
ISSN-L : 0388-0036
Volume 39 , Issue 3
Showing 1-2 articles out of 2 articles from the selected issue
  • Yuzo YAMADA
    1984 Volume 39 Issue 3 Pages 205-218
    Published: 1984
    Released: June 22, 2007
    JOURNALS FREE ACCESS
    Economics has been titled“Political Economy”for a long time since the Classical School. The word economy is etymologically related to oikos (house), so in order to tell social economy, an adjective“political”(that is“social”in Greek origin) must be attached to economy. At the same time, “Political Economy”had another meaning, implicating“the science of a statesman”as Adam Smith called it, although no clear distinctions between policy and theory were observed.
    Alfred Marshall used“Economics”in place of Political Economy. He dealt with laws of causality in economic facts, but did not admit to give valuations for them. Even in his work on economic welfare, the thesis was to inquire into the causes of welfare (or wealth) in society, putting welfare as an objective of valuations aside.
    Nowadays, we find that“Political Economy”is adopted as a political science or a policy science, by some heterodox economists, especially those of Neoinstitutionalism. Among others, Gunnar Myrdal deserves to be paid attention in the methodological point of view. In his opinion, any economic thinking could not be neutral in regard to political situation, left or right. Then he asserts that it is required for a policy science to set value premises as hypotheses, not value judgements themselves, and to examine the relevance of them to the reality. The recent“Political Economy”, it seems to me, may be a way to tear off the mask of neutrality in economic thinking and to find, if any, common ground of knowledge for conflicting opinions.
    Download PDF (1542K)
  • Tomohei TANIGUCHI
    1984 Volume 39 Issue 3 Pages 219-235
    Published: 1984
    Released: June 22, 2007
    JOURNALS FREE ACCESS
    The purpose of this article is to describe some of the legal problems arising from the use of burial ground in Japan today. Under the Japanese traditional custom of ancestor worship the consecrated ground where one's ancestors are buried and their spirits are believed to be abiding is highly respected. A kind of customary easement has been recognized for hundreds of years for the users of burial ground. Today, however, there arises often a conflict between such customary easement and statutory property right (or ownership).
    Download PDF (2092K)
feedback
Top