The experimenter administered the Handedness Inventory, Finger Tapping Test, Finger Identification Test and Tactile Form Recognition Test to 20 learning disabled children, 10 males and 10 females, and to 38 normal control children, 19 males and 19 females. Their age ranged from 9 to 15 years old. The results of the Handedness Inventory showed that 8 (40%) of the learning disabled children were right handers, 8 (40%) were left handers. On the other hand, 32 (84%) of the control children were right handers, 4 (11%) were mixed handers, and 2 (5%) were left handers. The distribution of handedness differed significantly between the learnig disabled and normal children (x^2=119.34, df=2, p<.001). That is, 60% of the learning disabled were non-right handers whereas 16% of the normal were non-right handers. The scores of the left and right hand on the Finger Tapping Test were as follows: 82.6 and 88.1 (male learning disabled children), 78.4 and 98.0 (female learning disabled children). 106.2 and 113.8 (male normal children), 103.4 and 118.6 (female normal children). These results suggest that the performance of the learning disabled children were significantly inferior to those of the normal children (F (1, 48)=16.46, p<.001), and the right hand performance was superior to the left hand in both groups of the children (F (1, 48)=24.44, p<.001). In the Finger Identification Test, the mean percentages of correct responses for the left and right hand were as follows: 46% and 41% (male learning disabled children), 48% and 36% (female learning disabled children), 69% and 77% (male normal children), 78% and 82% (female normal children). These results indicate that the accuracy of the Finger Identification was significanly different between the learning disabled and the normal control children (F (1, 48)=52.95, p<.001). The right hand performance was superior to that of the left hand in the normal children, whereas the left hand performance was superior to that of the right hand in the learning disabled children. In the Tactile Form Recognition Test, the normal control children's performance was superior to that of the learning disabled children (F (1, 48)=65.63, p<.001). The results of the above four measures suggest that the learning disabled children may have intra-hemispheric dysfunction and/or deficits of inter-hemispheric integration, whereas the normal children have established the cerebral specialization and may use both hemisphere's functions synergistically.
View full abstract