In Indonesia there are several regional styles of
gamelan such as Javanese, Sundanese, and Balinese. These differ not only in terms of instruments and musical styles but also in terms of the socio-cultural context.
After Indonesia became independent, formal institutes (conservatories) were built to preserve, promote, and develop the traditional performing arts in each region. Following independence, traditional musicians have been called
seniman alam (artists of nature, or natural artists) and have been distinguished from the So-called intellectual musicians who received their formal musical education in the institutes. While the former focuses on oral transmission, the latter is conspicuous for its orientation towards musical literacy, especially the use of notation in musical education and research.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the meaning of the transformation of orality by analyzing the learning processes of Sundanese
gamelan in West Java.
In West Java the theory of musical notation (number notation) originated in work authored by Raden Machjar Angga Koesoemadinata (1902-79), in collaboration with Yaap Kunst (1891-1960), written during the 1920s and 1930s. His theoretical model has been by performing arts institutes: SMK N. 10 Bandung, former SMKI Bandung (1958-) and STSI Bandung (1970-). The introduction and strengthening of literacy in music through systems such as Sundanese notation and solmization has made it possible to systematize traditional music education, including the
gamelan genres
pelog/
salendro and
gamelan degung.
The amount of notation used in learning
gamelan pelog/
salendro in the institutes changes as the learning stage proceeds. At the rudimentary stage students begin to learn an ensemble of
gamelan with a score which contains the basic patterns of the main instruments, such as
goong & kempul, kenong, saron and
bonang. Teachers say that using the score is useful for the students to understand the musical structure visually, helping them to learn the basic ways of playing every instrument. Teachers also use some kinds of etude in teaching such instruments as
kendang and
gambang that need improvisation and variation. The etudes can help students gain basic knowledge of those instruments. However, they are not used in ensemble lessons.
The score is not used at the advanced. Only a notation of nuclear tones like
posisi kenongan (‘position of kenong tones’) or
patokan is employed. It is possible to draw out various versions of performance from this notation despite its prescriptive function. However, some students learn how to play orally even when they play depending on the notation. Students in the final stages have to be able to play without notation, as it is still common in contemporary Sundanese music culture for
gamelan to perform without notation.
Use of notation in
gamelan class in the institutes enables teachers to teach many students of different levels together. In addition to this, students can learn by themselves to an extent, going over the lessons by the notation. However, notation has also led to a decrease in the ability for musical interaction and application (e. g., improvisation, memorization, both characteristics of oral transmission), and, as a result, conflict is emerging between the transmission of
seniman alam and the institutional education of traditional music.
The institutes of performing arts that introduced musical literary have been developing it for about 40 years. In the early period some teachers who had come from
seniman alam, who were trained in the oral system, subsequently acquired the ability to reading and write notation. It is said that the traditional way of learning with orality and the modern way with literacy coexisted at that time. Teachers have developed
etude
抄録全体を表示