The co-operative observations of micro-earthquakes were carried out during summers in 1963, 1964 and 1965. Periods of the observations were about two weeks. The ultrasensitive seismometers worked on during the period from 9p.m. to 4a.m. on the next day, because of high ground noise in the day time. The instruments at that time were not so developed as the ones nowadays, then the opereators suffered from the various troubles of instruments and every day livings. As each party had been formed by the most excellent seismologists at that time, however, the results of the observations are worthy of analysing even the pressent time in order to get percepts for the future studies.
The discussions at the meetings held before the co-operative observations took up various significant topics. For instance, the fowllowings were discussed; what are the field conditions for the study of ultramicro-earthquakes; where is the model district to satisfy these conditions; what is the most effective arrangement of the stations; what subject should be investigated now, and so on. After the observations, the results of reconsiderations had been discussed, i. e, . the needs of man powers, the improvements of recording systems, the automatic data processings and the more basic studies were pointed out.
The detectability is defined as the ratio of the number of observed earthquakes to the number of earthquakes which should be observed. The first assumption is the ground motions which are judged as the ones due to earthquakes must be observed, at least, at two stations almost simultaneously. The second assumption is the detectable distance must be greater than the greatest epicentral distance among the ones associated with the stations which observed the earthquake. Therefore, it may be said that the station failed to observe the earthquake if that station whose epicentral distance is less than the detectable distance did not record this earthquake motion.
It is concluded;
(1) The detectability is depend on the institute in charge of the observation.
(2) The detectabilities of routine stations for micro-earthquakes are lower than the ones of the temporary stations for ultramicro-earthquakes.
(3) Generally, the detectability of the station situated on the ground of lower noise level is higher than the one of the station of opposite ground condition.
(4) The all-inclusive conclusion is that all the station whose detectabilities greater than 90% had been set up on the less noisy ground and the staffs at that stations read up carefully even the small earthquake motions as the ground noise.
抄録全体を表示