After the end of Cold War, the Central European Countries which the political situation had made the Eastern Europe wished to come back to western European society. In may 1. 2004, the Central European Countries will join to the European Union (EU). I could say that they accomplish their cherished desire. And this is not only for the Central European Countries, but also for the EU. Because the EU has the direction of "Europe's Dual Enla-rgement". But, with the Enlargement, they have some problems. This is the issue of that the domestic law may be conflict with the EU law order which are the Treaty establishing the European Community and "acquis communautaires". The matter of importance in this paper is that the domestic law which has rights and duties between the Country which makes this law and Non-EU Countries has the power of demand in reconvention. This paper reviews an issue that the domestic law may be conflict with the EU law order, when the Central European Countries join to EU. Of course Hungary is one of the above Central European Countries. Especially, this argument focuses to the issue of the EU Law order and Hungarian domestic law which is Act on Hungarians living in neighbouring states. Because this Act apply to persons declaring themselves to be of Hungarian ethnic origin who are not Hungarian citizens and who reside in Non-EU Countries the Republic of Croatia, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro or Ukraine.

抄録全体を表示

Ungarn verabschiedet das Grundgesetz von Ungarn am 25. April 2011. Ungarn hat eine neue Verfassung vom 1. Januar 2012 umgesetzt. Diese Grundgesetz von Ungarn zeigt ungefahr 20 Jahre danach Lebewohlperfekt von einem Kommunismussystem von der systemischen Verwandlung in 1989. Es zeigt, dass der Ungarn reife dem demokratische Staat fur den EU Mitglied. Aber, die Situation wo Widerspruch in der Europaischen Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte werden verdachtigt, ist unter dieser neuen Verfassung entstanden. In Ungarn, Einrichtung von das Recht auf personliche Freiheit ist ein Problem. In diesem Papier betrachte ich das Problem der Konflikt mit der Verfassung von Ungarn und der Europaischen Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte.

抄録全体を表示

In Central Europe, the Hungarian minority have been forced to become the national minority in some countries following border changes in the region during the twentieth century—in particular, Slovakia, which counted among its population of 5 million people around 450,000 ethnic Hungarians. The Hungarian minority could not be ignored, especially in Slovak politics, and its party participated in the Slovak government from 1998 to 2006. This demonstrated to the world in general and to Western European countries in particular that Slovakia had become a European democratic country that could accept minority politicians in its government. Ethnic Hungarians had been a minority in (Czecho)Slovakia for at least 70 years, but they became significant political actors only after the end of the repressive communist government, which did not recognize their right to be active or speak as an ethnic minority. Democratization and the related idea of supporting political change from the socialist regime helped promote the establishment of minority solidarity.

This study investigated the effects and limitation of minority solidarity, as influenced by such democratic values as collective ideas as freedom of expression, civic activity, market economy, Western political orientation, and minority rights and protections. This research adopted an anthological approach based on fieldwork in southern Slovakia, where the Hungarian minority lives as a regional majority. The author conducted interviews with community leaders in the southern Slovak society and observed participants’ events and activities.

In late 1980s, the Hungarian minority in Slovakia were able to obtain information directly regarding Hungary, which had reformed its economic and political system earlier. Bolstered by the example of the Hungarian condition, they were able to easily imagine a democratic world, and this drove the Hungarian minority to participate in social movements aimed at changing the regime, not only because they were eager to improve the minority condition but also they had struggled under the less reformed Czechoslovak society. Vaguely proposed democratic values and associated rhetoric attracted more minorities, further establishing minority solidarity. For the Hungarian minority in Slovakia, demands for democratic reforms subsumed ethnic identity, as calls for change and democratic rhetoric were more acceptable to the Slovaks than the protection of minority rights.

However, democratic values alone were not enough to sustain minority solidarity for 30 years. Currently, minority politicians and activists continue to secure rights and protections for ethnic Hungarians in Slovakia; however, doing so conversely undermines the effectiveness of democracy as the voice of the people given the diversity of the population. This has led to tensions in the Hungarian minority community between those desirous of ensuring the purity of the ethnic Hungarian community in a multicultural society and those desirous of living peacefully with Slovak neighbors in their daily lives. Adding to this erosion of solidarity among minorities, the recent transformation of Hungarian politics as the ideal goal of the past for ethnic Hungarians will likely move the current minority to consider new types of minority politics.

抄録全体を表示