詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "ウクライナ国立銀行"
3件中 1-3の結果を表示しています
  • 高橋 智彦
    ロシア・ユーラシアの社会
    2022年 2022 巻 1060 号 16-29
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2023/10/09
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 森 彰夫
    国際開発研究
    2001年 10 巻 2 号 171-184
    発行日: 2001/11/15
    公開日: 2020/03/28
    ジャーナル フリー

    Fostering small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) is indispensable to create workable economic system in the transition countries. By developing sufficient number of SMEs effective allocation of resources can be realized among regions and sectors, and also new employment opportunity can be created and thus the unemployment can be decreased. However, current situation is that the access to working capital and long-term loan for fixed capital investment is limited and the lack of management ability and technological information is impeding the development of SMEs.

    The influx of foreign direct investments (FDI) is not enough at all for Balkan countries and CIS countries to recover the GDP level of 1989. Most of the FDI is related to the privatization and the green field investments are very little. In 1998, the financial crisis in Russia led to worsening economic conditions in these regions, principally in the countries of the former Soviet Union.

    Currently the international financial institutions and bilateral donors are financing many infrastructure projects, however, in a mid-term period the demand will not follow.

    The commercial banks should have a financial intermediary function such as collecting money from individuals and lending to productive industries. However, current commercial banks are not working as intermediary institutions.

    If there is no functioning market system, it is necessary to utilize small and medium-sized enterprise financing as policy based directed credit to foster SMEs.

    The EBRD and other donors extend assistance to strengthen the financial sector in the transition countries by investing directly in financial institutions and by providing loans to the enterprise sector via local intermediaries. However, due to its high interest rate, SMEs are faced with difficulties to acquire them in some countries.

  • CISの行方
    中井 和夫
    国際政治
    1993年 1993 巻 104 号 99-116,L12
    発行日: 1993/10/10
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The agreement reached in Minsk on 7-8 December 1991 to create a Commonwealth of Independent States was signed by the leaders of three slavic countries. The agreement stated that, “the USSR as a subject of international law and geopolitical reality ceases its existence”. Ukrainian president Kravchuk stated that it had prevented the uncontrolled disintegration of the former Soviet Union, but “We cannot allow ourselves to be locked in the Commonwealth, we should go in search of wide ranging relations with other countries”, added he. Many Ukrainians regarded CIS more sceptically than president Kravchuk. According to an opinion poll conducted after signing of the Minsk accords, Ukrainians were the most pessimistic of the three founding states.
    Elected as the first president of Ukraine, Kravchuk shortly succeeded to establish an authoritarian regime. He introduced several new institutions which strengthened his presidential power. By shifting his position from “sovereign communist” to the “fighter for Ukrainian independent statehood” Kravchuk neutralized his former opponents. Also he recruited many key persons from opponents camp to the higher governmental posts. But Kravchuk's authoritarian regime lasted barely one year. New prime minister L. Kuchima challenged Kravchuk in power game and weakened Kravchuk's position last winter. Kravchuk's authoritarian regime was further weakened by the economic crises in Ukraine.
    Since Ukraine's ratification of its independence in December 1991, its quarrels with Russia grabbed international headlines. During the early months of 1992, Russo-Ukrainian relations reached so low an ebb that many observers felt the big possibility of the Ukraine's retreat from the CIS. However, an reapprochment has taken place. An agreement was reached between the two sides on many of the outstanding areas of conflict at the Dagomys summit meeting in June 1992 between president Yeltsin and Kravchuk. Although there are still many points of conflict between them, relations between them have become quite stable.
    From the begining Ukraine did not possess strong loyality to the CIS. Ukraine regarded CIS as an economic cooperative organization. Therefore, Ukraine was always against the CIS as a unit of political-military integration. If CIS would be strengthened as a political institution like the former Soviet Union, Ukraine would likely choose the alternative of “exit” from the CIS.
    Finally, what is the meaning and impact of the independence of Ukraine in the region? From the Baltic to the Black Sea, there are now six new independent states, including Ukraine. These western parts of the former Soviet Union can be called the “New Eastern Europe”. thrusts Central Europe (former Eastern Europe) to the west and at the same time pushes Russia to the east.
feedback
Top