It has been a vexing problem as to whether Aramaic had from the outset or not. Some insist that Aramaic lacked
yaqtul at first, but that it intruded into Aramaic later as a result of the influence of Canaanite languages. Others argue in favor of the original existence of
yaqtul in Aramaic.
Formerly, three verbs in the Aramaic inscription of Zakkur, king of Lu'ash and Hamath (ca. the second half of the ninth century BCE), found in Afis (
KAI202), were regarded as the oldest attestation of
yaqtul conjugation. They are _??__??__??__??__??__??__??__??__??__??_ (A11) and _??__??__??__??__??_ (A15), all of which are preceded by a conjunction
waw. In this inscription, however, both
qatala and
yaqtulu are dominant in expressing narrative past and future/present tenses respectively. The appearance of the three
yaqtul forms is therefore just an exceptional phenomenon. Furthermore, the language and style of the Zakkur inscription is strongly influenced by the Canaanite culture. The
yaqtul in this inscription might be borrowed from the Canaanite languages but is foreign to the original language.
The newly discovered Tel Dan Inscription, dated around the first half of the ninth century BCE, contains the following eleven finite verbs: _??__??__??__??__??__??_ (B1.1), _??__??__??_ (A1.2), _??__??__??__??__??_ (A1.3), _??__??__??_ (A1.3), _??__??__??__??_ (B1.3), _??__??__??__??__??_[_??_] (B1.4), _??__??__??__??_ (A1.5), _??__??__??_[_??_] (B1.5), _??__??__??__??__??_ (A1.6), _??__??__??__??__??_ (A1.8), _??__??__??__??_ (A1.9), out of which two (_??__??__??__??__??_ [and] _??__??__??__??_) could be absolute infinitive and are definitely not
qatala. The rest are minutely analyzed from the lexicographical, morphological, and contextual points of view and it can be concluded that they should be
yaqtul. Still more, two
yaqtul forms (_??__??__??_ and _??__??__??_) are not preceded by waw. Thus, the
yaqtul forms in the Tel Dan inscription regularly function to denote the narrative past, regardless of the precedence or non-precedence of the conjunction
waw.
The verbs preceded by the conjunction
waw in the Deir 'Alla inscription must be the remnant of inherent
yaqtul forms. The following forms are found: _??__??__??__??__??__??_ (I, 1), _??__??__??__??__??__??_ (I, 2), _??__??__??__??_ (I, 3), _??__??__??__??__??_ (I, 4/5), _??__??__??__??_ (I, 1), _??__??__??__??_ (I, 4).
Although Gibson's assertion that
yaqtul exists in Biblical Aramaic is rejected, the 33 examples enumerated as
yaqtul by M. S. Smith in the Moabite Mesha inscription (ca. 850 BCE) should be accepted as correct. In this inscription
yaqtul, along with qatala, plays a leading role in the narrative past tense.
In conclusion,
yaqtul should have been inherent in both the Tel Dan inscription and the Mesha inscription. The Tel Dan inscription is, therefore, the oldest solid attestation of
yaqtul in Aramaic. The six examples in the Deir 'Alla Aramaic inscription also affirm the original existence of
yaqtul forms in Aramaic itself.
抄録全体を表示