In this paper, the writer tried to systematize many copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) in all parts of Japan, based on the investigation of them. This trial was done to show the definite standard to the collation of many copies. First of all, the copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) are syst-ematically classified into two large groups, the group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) and of Funabashi-bon (_??__??__??_), which had wide circulation in the Edo (_??__??_) era. The group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon(_??__??__??__??__??_) is classified into the group of Naikaku-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) recopied from the copy which Morotsugu Fujiwara (_??__??__??__??_) possessed and the group of the copy in 35 volumes which Morotsugu (_??__??_) copied in Kenji (_??__??_) 2. Both of them were borrowed from Kanezawa-bunko (_??__??__??__??_) and were carried to Kyoto by Hidetsugu Toyotomi (_??__??__??__??_).
The former was given to Harusue Kikutei (_??__??__??__??_) and the latter was presented to the Imperial Court As the result of the copy in 35 volumes being copied by noblemen and scholars in the Edo (_??__??_) era, Tanaka-bon(_??__??__??_), Takatsukasa-bon (_??__??__??_), Kamitani-Motohira-bon(_??__??__??__??__??_), etc. are in existence. On the other hand, Funabashi-bon (_??__??__??_) was copied by Mototada Hirata (_??__??__??__??_). It (Hirata-bon, _??__??__??_) was recopied by Sadanari Kazan-in (_??__??__??__??__??_). These are in circulation intricately. In the meantime, three copies which don't belong to the group of Kanezawa-bunko-bon (_??__??__??__??__??_) also exist. The writer found out that they were recopied from the manuscript which had been copied in the Kamakura (_??__??_) era. Therefore, the writer came to the conclusion that Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) which we are using now is one of the copies made in the Kamakura (_??__??_) era and that Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_) now in use isn't always the original Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??__??_). From this point of view, the writer made the pedigree of the copies of Ryo-no-shuge (_??__??__??_).

抄録全体を表示

The decline of centralized administration in ancient Japan was accompanied by the scrapping and building of government offices and changes in their internal structure to enable them to be operated in a more intensive manner. As for the bureaucrats who manned these offices during the medieval period, it has been pointed out that there was a system of hereditary offices (kanshiukeoi) and one of non-hereditary (hi-kanshi-ukeoi非官司請負) offices. This article will deal with the latter type of office using the examples of the Shurishiki修理職(Office of Palace Construction and Repair) and the Kuraryo内蔵寮(Office of the Imperial Household) during the early medieval period to trace and describe the changes that were implemented in their operating systems. As a result of his investigation, the author finds that in the case of the Shurishiki, a "proprietor"(chigyosha知行者) was placed above the traditional office head (shuridaibu修理大夫) and deputy (nenyo年預) and could appoint their relatives or retainers as the office's top bureaucrats, while sharing their duties. Such a system of proprietary rights and interests over such offices (including the Meryo馬寮Horse Stables) can be traced back to the early 13th century in the case of the Shurishiki and would develop further throughout the Kamakura period. As proprietors assumed more and more authority over their offices and traditional top bureaucrats grew more and more out of touch with practical day-to-day operations, during the Muromachi period, the Shurishiki seemed to have been run by samurai (buke武家) instead of aristocrats (kuge公家). Moreover, the division of labor in government offices became more compartmentalized, and individual jobs were also inherited though specific families in some cases. For example, the Kuraryo is said to have been run by the Yamashina山科family during the Muromachi period, but rights to succession (shiki職) applied to specific tasks or offices, like department head or deputy. The author concludes that it has become necessary to reexamine the Kamakura bureaucracy from the standpoint of such proprietorship over government offices.

抄録全体を表示