詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "天台座主"
363件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 清水 擴
    建築史学
    2007年 48 巻 147-154
    発行日: 2007年
    公開日: 2018/08/17
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 岡野 浩二
    日本仏教綜合研究
    2016年 15 巻 15 号 29-51
    発行日: 2016年
    公開日: 2023/02/15
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 庵谷 行遠
    印度學佛教學研究
    2018年 66 巻 2 号 693-697
    発行日: 2018/03/20
    公開日: 2019/01/11
    ジャーナル フリー

    Enshin criticized the doctrine of the Nichiren-sect on a 62-item basis in a sharp manner in his Hanichirengi. This paper focuses on the interpretation of the Lotus Sūtra in the Hanichirengi. I examine the logical structure with which Enshin accused the Nichiren sect, which he did from the viewpoint of equality.

  • 小柏 典華, 光井 渉
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2017年 82 巻 738 号 2063-2070
    発行日: 2017年
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル フリー
     Shiga-in Temple is a Tendai sect temple located in Sakamoto Otsu, Shiga Prefecture, Japan. While this structure was built in the first half of the 17th century, ruled over by the Rinnouzi-Monzeki priesthood who were of royal blood, it is currently the main temple of the Hiezan Enryakuji-temple concourse, the leading site of the Tendai sect, and at the same time is a residence for the Tendai master.
     Buildings constructed by Nikai-Syoin, Kyakuden, and Kuri can be found within the precincts of Shiga-in Temple; the Edo period buildings that were previously located on this site burned down during 1877.
     Early research on Shiga-in Temple initially assumed that the site functioned as a private academic training or retirement facility for Rinnouzi-Monzeki at Mt. Hieizan, and secondarily as an officially controlled temple. However, while these initial studies did partly discuss the function of Shiga-in Temple, no research to date has dealt with either the construction or management system of this site. This study uses newly available historical materials in the collection of Eizan Bunko on Hieizan Enryakuzi to clarify the management system and prefectural organization of the Shiga-in Temple.
     First, we demonstrate the presence of three organizations that controlled the operation of Shiga-in Temple, Tendaizasu, Rinnouzi-Monzeki, and Shiga-in Rusui. Of these, Tendaizasu was the top level of a sect denominated from ancient times in Hieizan, while Rinnouzi-Monzeki was the top level of the newly established Tendai sect denominated in Kanto. Finally, Shiga-in Rusui was a worker for an organization responsible for the temple of Hieizan Enryakuzi. Although previous research has argued that the Tendaizasu and the Rinnouzi-Monzeki were unified subsequent to the Edo period, the two organizations were formally at the top level of Shiga-in Temple. This is because these sects were always present in Kanto, while Shiga-in Temple was always managed by a Shiga-in Rusui on this mountain. Shiga-in Rusui was a priest appointed to fulfill a number of duties, including that of representing the temple in external relations, of serving as deputy for the head of the temple when he was absent, as well as managing internal tasks and receiving guests.
     The second aim of this study is an attempt to verify that Shiga-in Temple building was not reconstructed during the modern era. To do this, we used documents and pictures from historical records.
     Our analysis shows that building work at Shiga-in Temple started in 1645, and that initial restoration work was carried out in 1748, before large earthquakes occurred in 1751 and 1830. Documents and comparisons of pictorial records of construction show that six periods of restoration and maintenance work took place in the early Edo period. From 1744, four images provide evidence for this. The first shows the first restoration, and the second, from 1767, shows painting before repairs as a result of extensive restorations carried out by the shogunate government. The third image shows repairs carried out by the shogunate government in the 19th century, while the fourth is a picture from the Meiji era, towards the end of the Edo period. These images show the extent of restorations in each period up until the present.
     Historical documents and diary materials reveal that repair work to Shiga-in Temple was carried out repeatedly. In addition, using historical drawings, we are able to elucidate the appearance of Shiga-in Temple during each period of restoration work. For example, we are able to elucidate the construction of the precinct from historical drawings, and verify a group of northern boundaries as a Kyakuden, a Kosyoin, and a Kitchen, while a Nikai-syoin is represented by a group in the south.
  • 尾上 寛仲
    印度學佛教學研究
    1978年 26 巻 2 号 545-550
    発行日: 1978/03/20
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 谷口 正樹
    大阪歴史博物館研究紀要
    2021年 19 巻 059-070
    発行日: 2021年
    公開日: 2022/02/25
    研究報告書・技術報告書 フリー
  • 奈良 弘元
    印度學佛教學研究
    2005年 53 巻 2 号 492-499
    発行日: 2005/03/20
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 石田 啓, 石田 テル子
    日本体育学会大会号
    1988年 39A 巻 001A20
    発行日: 1988/08/20
    公開日: 2017/08/25
    会議録・要旨集 フリー
  • 岡本 嘉之
    印度學佛教學研究
    2001年 49 巻 2 号 687-690
    発行日: 2001/03/20
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 運営組織と空間序列から
    小柏 典華
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2018年 83 巻 749 号 1317-1324
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2018/07/30
    ジャーナル フリー
     The Shiga-in Temple is a Tendai sect temple built in the first half of the 17th century and located in Sakamoto Otsu, Shiga Prefecture, Japan. This study seeks to clarify the spatial arrangements indicating hierarchy of the Shiga-in Temple in the Edo period. The paper is organized as follows:
     1. Introduction
     The previous study demonstrated that three authorities controlled the operation of the Shiga-in Temple, namely the master of the Tendai sect, the chief priest, and the Shiga-in administrator. The Tendai master and the chief priest were people of authority, while the Shiga-in administrator was like a house-keeper.
     2. Floor restoration plan and equipment
     The floor restoration plan for the historical restoration was derived from ancient drawings. In addition, historical architectural documents and diary contents reveal the equipment that was used to restore the Shiga-in Temple.
     3. The configuration of the temple premises is shown in the restoration figure.
     The restoration figure shown in Chapter 2 compares with that found in more recent historical documents. The recent documents tell us how spatial configuration was used by the three organizations.
     A Kyakuden is used for public service and in ceremonies conducted by the Tendai master and chief priest. It is a type of large-scale construction equipment that is of excellent quality. A Ko-shoin is used for the office and private study of the chief priest; it is a piece of equipment that is of good quality. A Yo-beya is used by the Shiga-in administrator in temple administration. It is a piece of equipment that is of high quality. A Daidokoro and Nagaya are used in kitchens and residences by housekeepers. These pieces of equipment are of standard quality. A Nikai-shoin is used for the private ceremonies of the Tendai master and it also serves as his living quarters. It is of the highest quality in the Shiga-in Temple. A Seisho is used for kitchen and housekeeping needs and is reserved only for the Nikai-shoin. This equipment is of standard quality.
     For the reasons mentioned above, the features of the temple premises must be clarified.
     4. Conclusion
     This study seeks to clarify the complex correspondence that occurred among the three authorities organizations and the spatial configuration of the Shiga-in Temple from the restoration figure.
     The temple premises could be divided into the north and south areas. The north area shows the standard configuration for Buddhist temples, including the Kyakuden, public main hall, Ko-shoin, a private study for the chief priest, Yo-beya, temple administration, Daidokoro and Nagaya, housekeeping, and the residential facilities of the temple. The south area shows a configuration that is particular to the Tendai sect in the Edo period, including the Nikai-shoin, a place for the head of the sect to lead ceremonies, as well as living quarters and a Seisho, which is an attached service room.
  • 尾上 寛仲
    印度學佛教學研究
    1984年 32 巻 2 号 566-574
    発行日: 1984/03/25
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 松田 宣史
    中世文学
    1988年 33 巻 137-148
    発行日: 1988年
    公開日: 2018/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 尾上 寛仲
    印度學佛教學研究
    1972年 21 巻 1 号 288-291
    発行日: 1972/12/31
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 渡辺 守順
    印度學佛教學研究
    1979年 28 巻 1 号 208-211
    発行日: 1979/12/31
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 「上方」を中心として
    尾上 寛仲
    印度學佛教學研究
    1962年 10 巻 1 号 213-216
    発行日: 1962/01/25
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 清水 擴
    建築史学
    2005年 44 巻 107-124
    発行日: 2005年
    公開日: 2018/08/17
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 村田 治郎, 福山 敏男, 西川 幸治
    日本建築学会論文報告集
    1962年 77 巻 36-41
    発行日: 1962/09/30
    公開日: 2017/08/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    In nara period, the great and main temples and monasteries had clustered in and around the capital on the plain. But at the outset of the ninth century the rise of the new sects of Tendai and shingon, was accompanied by a marked change in the character of newfounded religious establishments, And the introducers of the new sects, in establishing their headquarters instead on the secluded mountain tops of Hieizan and Koyasan, seems to have been motived at least in part by a spirit of ascetic reform. On the Mt. Hiei, the territory occupied by Enryakuji is so irregular that any formal combination at large scale is impossible. And Enryakuji is divided in three part, Toto, Saito and Yokokawa. The lecture hall we mention here is situated in Toto. We survey the evolution of this lecture hall by documents and the excavation on this site. i. The survey by old documents. The documents tell that the lecture hall has been ten times burnt and rebuilt. The first building was founded before the middle of 9C, and its plan type was 5Ken 4men which means that the chancel was 5 bays long, and that there were aisles on four sides. But that building was burnt down in 966 and was rebuilt in 971. Thence the hall was enlarged 7Ken 4Men. Afterward, in 1285 the lecture hall had the attached fore hall indicated by the term Raido, "Hall for worship". This plan-type was followed by the building in the "Kanei period". ii. The survey of the excavation. By the excavation in July-August 1961, we found only three layers of newer foundation. We conjecture that three layers will show that the Building III belongs to Kanei period, Building II to Tenmon period and Building I to Oei period. We have ascertained it by strateography and construction of foundation that the table land and the surface of older basement was perhaps several times cut off by the enlargement of building plan, so trace of the building before Kamakura period is left. The foundation of Kanei period was so carefully and rigidly constructed that it was quite suitable to support the heavy two-storeyed building.
  • 尾上 寛仲
    印度學佛教學研究
    1976年 24 巻 2 号 643-647
    発行日: 1976/03/31
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 青木 淳
    宗教研究
    2004年 77 巻 4 号 1118-1119
    発行日: 2004/03/30
    公開日: 2017/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 渡辺 守順
    印度學佛教學研究
    1978年 26 巻 2 号 753-756
    発行日: 1978/03/20
    公開日: 2010/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top