チベット系諸言語は複雑な証拠性・認識性の標示体系をもつ言語群として知られている。これまで多くの先行研究がさまざまなチベット系諸言語の証拠性の記述を行ってきたが，用語と枠組みが先行研究によって多岐にわたるため，これらの言語の証拠性に関する対照研究は困難であった。本稿では，研究蓄積のあるラサチベット語の証拠性の体系を1つの基準として，共通の調査票を用いて5種類のチベット系諸言語の判断動詞と

に関する「アクセス系」に属する証拠性の体系を記述し，各形式の形態を分析する。次いで，言語間に認められる異同を議論する。結論として，本稿で取り上げたカム及びアムド地域のチベット系諸言語は，判断動詞とを統一的な証拠性の枠組みのもとに記述することが可能であり，その中で細部に異なりが認められるものの，本質的な体系を共有していることを示す。

抄録全体を表示

The-te aru construction has been analyzed to date as the expression of the ‘resultative aspect, ’ the description of a state resulting from some previous volitional action_However, it still remains to be seen (i) what is the whole picture of a wide variety of meanings carried by that con construction, which is here referred to as the ‘conceptual domain’ of the construction, and (ii) whether that domain is rationally structured. The purpose of the present paper, then, is to provide a satisfactory answer to these problems.
With this goal in view, the -te aru constructions will first be classified into two types from the syntactic viewpoint, namely, the ‘Atypetype’ and ‘B type’ constructions. On the basis of this classification the and ‘B type’ constructions. On the basis of this classification the semantic characteristics of the constructions will be elucidated, whereby it will be shown that the conceptual domain is composed of a continuum extending from the domain of a very concrete resultative aspect to that of a highly abstract resultative aspect. Thus, the structure of the domain in question is shown to be adequately rational, having a systematic, internal unity. The fact is noteworthy that a coherent unity is found in the seeming heterogeneity of the meanings conveyed by the -te aru construction, thus indicating that there is a strong form-meaning correlation with this particular construction.

抄録全体を表示