詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "成良親王"
8件中 1-8の結果を表示しています
  • 鈴木 登美惠
    中世文学
    1992年 37 巻 20-28
    発行日: 1992年
    公開日: 2018/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 久保田 収
    密教文化
    1962年 1962 巻 58 号 1-41
    発行日: 1962/02/20
    公開日: 2010/03/12
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 家永 遵嗣
    史学雑誌
    1995年 104 巻 5 号 711-716
    発行日: 1995/05/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 吉原 弘道
    史学雑誌
    2002年 111 巻 7 号 35-59,142-143
    発行日: 2002/07/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The conventional research on the position held by Ashikaga Takauji 足利尊氏 within the government formed after the Kenmu 建武 imperial restoration (1334) tends to argue that the warrior leader was excluded from all of its affairs. However, Amino Yoshihiko 網野善彦 has proposed that such a view be reconsidered in the light that the Kenmu government officially gave Takauji charge over Chinzei 鎮西 (Kyushu) military affairs, a subject that is now being pursued by Mori Shigeaki 森茂暁 and Ito Kiyoshi 伊藤喜良. Nevertheless, the conventional skeptical view of Takauji's role has yet to be reconsidered ; and his involvement in the Kenmugovernment has by no means been thoroughly investigated. In the present article, the author conducts a detailed analysis of the time from Takauji's turn against the Kamakura Bakufu in the 4th month of Genko 3 (1333) through the post-coup de'etat settle ment. The research to date has tended to look upon Takauji's involvement in the settlement as anti-government in attitude ; however, it is a fact that 1) Takauji utilized his close relationship with Emperor Go-Daigo to raise troops during the conflict, and 2) petitions for Imperial recognition of deployment (chakuto-jo 着到状) to the battles fought in the Kanto and Chinzei regions were submitted to the Emperor through Takauji. Moreover, Takauji's receipt of these petitions stemmed not from any personal ambition, but rather from his position as an intermediary for the Emperor ; and the authority that Takauji assumed during the incident was not personally usurped, but always based on his relationship to the Emperor, and was finally officially recognized in his appointment as military commander-in-chief of Chinju-fu 鎮守府 on Genko 3/6/5. In addition, his investiture as a minister of state (kugyo 公卿) was an attempt by the Emperor to define his position within the imperial court's organization. The author concludes that rather than being excluded from the affairs of the Kenmu government, Ashikaga Takauji was placed in one of its positions of military responsibility, and from the standpoint of Takauji himself, this role was not the result of some move to expand his own political influence, but rather stemmed from the powers invested in him through his official appointment as commander-in-chief of Chinju-fu.
  • 峰岸 純夫
    史学雑誌
    1991年 100 巻 6 号 1115-1121
    発行日: 1991/06/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
  • ―太平記の四十年
    中西 達治
    中世文学
    2009年 54 巻 44-52
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2018/02/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 吉田 孝, 上横手 雅敬
    法制史研究
    1984年 1984 巻 34 号 168-183
    発行日: 1985/03/30
    公開日: 2009/11/16
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 秋山 喜代子
    史学雑誌
    1993年 102 巻 1 号 64-88,163-162
    発行日: 1993/01/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
    Regarding the problem of where and by whom children were raised, our general belief is that they were usually brought up by there own parents after ie 家 system was established in the medieval era. In fact, however, many were entrusted to foster parents as satogo 里子, which meant that lords committed their children to the care of their servants, both male (menoto 乳父) and female (menoto 乳母). These children were called yashinaigimi 養君. Satogo was different from the same term used for the custom from the early modern era on, when children were adopted by farmers living in suburban areas. This article aims to examine the overall ideas about upbringing and guardianship of children in the medieval era. Children who became yashinaigimi were those born of mistresses, those who could not expect to inherit the household, and those who had no caretakers or guardians for reason that their fathers had died or that their maternal relatives were not in power in the case of the Imperial family. These children were discriminated against and ill-treated, and lived lives evidently different from the legitimate children who were brought up in the house holds of their fathers and were privileged in many ways. Male and female menoto guarded and supported yashinaigimi instead of their parents, or their maternal relatives in the case of the Imperial family. Yashinaigimi lived with their menoto until the age between eleven and thirteen, at which time they were considered adults and thus expected to live independently. Male yashinaigimi usually became priests and many of the females became nyobo 女房. What should be noted as a political feature of this system is that some yashinaigimi, who were basically eliminated in the nomination for succession to the throne, were suddenly enthroned in time of war or by the sudden death of an Emperor. In such cases, the familles of their menoto played the role of guardians in place of maternal relatives. Such a custom, which was established in the early 12th century in parallel with the systematization of ie inherited by the legitimate children, became more prevalent in the late medieval era during which the ie system was firmly established, and was finally transformed into the adoption system of the kinsei era.
feedback
Top