This article takes up the installation ceremonies of royal consorts during the first half of the Koryo period in Korea, that of the queen mother(冊太后儀)and that of the queen(冊王妃儀)in order to clarify one aspect of the introduction of Chinese-style rituals into Koryo society and examine the position of royal consorts as one important aspect of kingship during the period in question. In part one, the author compares the Koryo ceremonial system to the Tang period work, Kaiyuan-li開元礼, and shows that while the installation ceremony for the queen was based on Chinese institutions, such revisions as not allowing the queen or other court ladies to be present at the ceremony were added, according to the inclination of the Koryo custom of limiting the presence of women at ceremonies. Part 2 turns to the rituals surrounding the installation of the queen mother and reveals that the queen mother wielded more political authority than the queen as indicated other non-ritual related evidence. In addition, the queen mother's installation ceremony, which was introduced in 1086, was done so under the foreign influence of the Song dynasty and its own queen mother installation ceremony. This also marked the first time since Guang-jong光宗, when queens began to be chosen from the royal family, that a member of another aristocratic family was named queen mother. It was in this way that the queen mother's installation ceremony was introduced in order to demonstrate in a ritual manner her influential political position in Koryo society.

抄録全体を表示

Under the reign of Koryo Dynasty, Jonsaka (田柴科) and Kongum-jonsaka (功蔭田柴科) were the two mainstays of its land system. These were the land grant systems both for cultivation and for firewood gathering, and the latter was granted only to the Upper Ryanban (両班) (bureaucrat), whose decendants were to succeed it, while the former was to much wider classes as Ryanban, soldiers and pettyofficials. It has been a long-standing problem among acholars to clarify the actual state and the character of these systems. In this article, the present author tries to analyze this problem from his own viewpoint, through examining the actual situation of Kubunjon and Yongyob-jon and also their mutual relation. Yongyob-jon in the Early Koryo Period was limited to those classes as Ryanban, soldiers and pettyofficials and was inherited by their decendants according to the special law of succession, called Jonjong-ryonrib (田丁連立). This Yongyob-jon System had more than a close relation with Jonsaka or Kongum-jonsaka System, or it was, in author's opinion, but another name for them. To the latter part of Koryo Period, this Yongyob-jon System had died out. In the Early Koryo Period, the grant of Kubun-jon was restricted to a specified woman or aged one and was to return to State at one's death. Kubun-jon did not represent Jonsaka or Kongum-jonsaka itself, but had a complememtary relation ot it. Judging from this mutually complementary function, it is very natural that the death of Kubun-jon coincided with that of Yongyob-jon. Though there still existed Kubun-jon in Later Koryo Period, its character was entirely different from that of tha earlier. On reading the historical records of Koryo Dynasty, one would find the classification of land, called Kubun-jon or Yongyob-jon throughout this period, originated from the land system in Chine. In the earlier period, those two had a very close relation to each other and their actual ststem were far from Jun-tian System (均田制) in China. In the systems of Kubun-jon and Yongyob-jon themselves, one may point out a remarkable change between the Earlier and the Later Koryo Periods. This fact also suggests that Koryo Period saw an entire change in its land system.

抄録全体を表示

　本稿は、朝鮮時代（一三九二～一九一〇）のうち、甲午改革（一八九四）以前を対象として、刑事法史の主要な研究について整理紹介し、現状の課題を提示するとともに、今後の可能性について展望するものである。まず、朝鮮時代の刑事法史研究の現在に至るまでの流れについて、一九世紀から植民地期を経て、解放後の大韓民国における成果をたどりながら、その特徴を概観した。第二に、朝鮮の法制定における中国法の位置付けに対する研究の現在点について、朝鮮が明律を受容した姿勢との関係から説明し、それを踏まえて第三に、明律とは異なる朝鮮独自の刑罰法が形成された事例として、盗罪に対する処罰と、私的復讐における減死を挙げた。第四に、刑事裁判に関係するいくつかの司法機関の成立過程と役割について述べ、第五に、訴冤、行刑および保放・赦を含めた刑事裁判手続の具体的内容について、刑曹の主導する一般的な断獄手続と、義禁府が国王の指示を受けて主宰する手続に区分して説明した。最後に、朝鮮刑事法史の課題と可能性について、地方の刑事裁判や軍人の犯罪に関する刑事裁判の実態解明の必要性、朝鮮刑事法史における時代区分の問題、そして刑事法にとどまらず、これまで蓄積された朝鮮法史の研究成果を世界中の研究者に発信する標準的入門書の必要性を提示した。

抄録全体を表示