The catalyst for improvement in recent North Korea (NK)-Soviet relations was the Soviet's acknowledgement of the Kim Jong Il successor regime, and its de facto recognition of NK's independence after Brezhnev's death. NK's assessment of “perestroika” has strong diplomatic implications, which reflects the closer relationship between the two countries. Perestroika is highly appraised on parts in accord with “juche (self-reliance)” ideology and course stressed by Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il. However, the NK leaders have clearly shown that, they will independently choose the reforms to be introduced. In this aspect, NK's reforms may be called selective reforms or openness based on “self-reliance.”
Namely, political structural reform or, “glasnost, ” a major part of “perestroika” is not in consistence with their own base for legitimacy. Therefore, it is necessary for them to prevent the influences of those reforms from penetrating the domestic arena. From the lessons of the past, the leaders feel a need to prevent the development of a domestic political power based on Soviet theories which would challenge the Kim Il Sung-Kim Jong Il regime. It becomes more imperative, especially, at the present moment when the effectiveness of the Kim Jong Il successor regime is being tested.
Therefore, as a preventive against the impact of “perestroika” a new ideology called “social-political organism” theory has been created as a legitimation for the successive regime. In this theory, it is said that the supreme leader, the party, and the poeple comprise one social organic body, and the supreme leader guarantees eternal “social-political organism” to its members. A socialist society have been redefined not only as collective possession of manufacturing means, but also as a society in which a “social-political organism” is created. Furthermore, this is a strong expression of NK nationalism, with the purpose of the recovering the superiority of socialism vis-a-vis capitalism.
Accordingly, in ideological terms, it could be said that the Soviet “perestroika”, political structural reform in particular, is being criticized as revisionism. However, it must be stressed that this ideology, at the present, is only domestically-oriented, and does not comprise a direct criticism toward the Soviet Union. As long as autonomy is respected between NK and the Soviet Union, a sense of incompatibility in each other's course or regime would not develop into open criticism as in the past. But the very fact that these mutual differences exist, sets the limits on NK-Soviet relations.
抄録全体を表示