詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する:
全文: "朝鮮総督府中枢院"
14件中 1-14の結果を表示しています
  • 須藤 茂子
    地図
    1980年 18 巻 3 号 5-10
    発行日: 1980/10/31
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 吉田 光男
    史学雑誌
    2003年 112 巻 7 号 1192-1194
    発行日: 2003/07/20
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 史学雑誌
    1978年 87 巻 2 号 246-270
    発行日: 1978/02/20
    公開日: 2017/10/05
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 周藤 吉之
    社会経済史学
    1942年 11 巻 11-12 号 1230-1236
    発行日: 1942/03/15
    公開日: 2017/09/24
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 第一一條の「慣習」を中心に
    李 丙洙
    法制史研究
    1976年 1976 巻 26 号 147-169,en12
    発行日: 1977/03/30
    公開日: 2009/11/16
    ジャーナル フリー
    Der Erlaß über koreanische Bürger-Angelegenheiten wurde am 18. März 1912 veröffentlicht, nachdem das japanische Imperium zweimal sorgfältige Vorbereitungsarbeit ausgeführt hatte: Das japanischeImperium reformierte 1908 das Strafgesetzbuch (Hyongbob-Daijon), das Gesetzbuch der Spät-Yi-Dynastie, and gab 1910 einen, Bericht über die Untersuchung der Gebräuchenheraus" (Kanshu-Chosa-Hokokusho).
    Der Erlaß über koreanische Bürger-Angelegenheiten enthält 82 Artikeln. Im ersten Artikel war die Durchführung des derzeitigen japanischen bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches (1896) and 23 anderer japanischen Gesetze bestimmt. Aber im Artikel 11 wurde festgelegt, daß die Verwandtschaft and Erbschaft von Koreaner auf den Gebräuchen beruhten.
    Der Erlaß über koreanische Bürger- Angelegenheiten wurde mehrmals reformiert, aber bis zum letzten blieben die folgenden Artikeln unverändert und sie alle beruhten auf den "Gebräuchen": Der Umfang der Verwandtschaft, Meinung der Eheschließenden and Zustimmung der Eltern über die Eheschließung, der Umfang des Eheschließungsverbots zwischen den nähen Familienangehörtigen, der Wartezeitdauer der Eheschließenden, Adoption and Erbschaft.
    Der japanische Imperialist führte das japanische Vermögensgesetz durch, das die Prinzipien von der Absolutheit der Privateigentumsrechte and der Vertragsfreiheit zur Grundlage hatte, so daß es die ökonomische Ausbeutung in Korea begünstigte; dagegen wandte der japanische Imperialist die feudalen Gebräuche dem Familiengesetz an, um den Ausbau der Menschenrechte in Korea zu unterdrücken.
  • 吉田 孝次郎
    繊維学会誌
    1995年 51 巻 6 号 P264-P267
    発行日: 1995/06/10
    公開日: 2008/06/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 深谷 敏鐵
    社会経済史学
    1942年 11 巻 11-12 号 1236-1244
    発行日: 1942/03/15
    公開日: 2017/09/24
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 五島 寧
    都市計画論文集
    2013年 48 巻 3 号 513-518
    発行日: 2013/10/25
    公開日: 2013/10/25
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    本研究は,日本統治下の京城(現;韓国ソウル)市街地建設において,日本人居留地の与えた影響を分析した。日本人居留地では優先的にインフラが整備されたと説明されることが多いが,本研究は,実証的な分析を通して,全く異なる結論を導きだしている。朝鮮総督府は,インフラの平準化を目指していたため,既に一定の都市基盤を備えていた日本人居留地への社会資本整備に消極的で,日本人住民の要望にも冷淡だった。そのため,本研究では,日本人居留地の存在は,都市計画や市区改正における与条件として機能しなかったと結論している。
  • 牧野 巽
    社会学評論
    1953年 3 巻 3 号 2-22
    発行日: 1953/04/30
    公開日: 2010/02/18
    ジャーナル フリー
    This article supplements the above mentioned article, which was published in Vol. 1, No. 1 of this review. In the previous article, the three ancient codes, Yôrô-Ryô of Japan (8th Century), Kieng-kuk-tâ-chen of Korea (15th Century) -and Lê-trieu-hinh-lûat of Annam (15 th Century), were compared with the present law or custom in Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Jakarta, 1_??_ Philippines and among the Maccassars and Bugis of Celebes. The following similarities among them were pointed out :
    1) The shares of the eldest son is not very much larger than that of other sons.
    2) The share of a female child is equal to that of a male child.
    3) Importance is attached to the property relationship between man and wife, to the mutual inheritance by conjugals, and to the difference between pre-marital separate property and post-marital joint property acquired through joint efforts.
    It is concluded that these, together with other similarities in the family system, and economic and cultural similarities existing among these peoples, justify the conclusion that these rice-cultivating peoples of East Asia formed one cultural sphere in ancient times.
    The present article supports the above conclusion by adding new materials concerning ancient Japan and Korea, which appeared to be the most controversial point in the previous article. Main emphasis in the present article is upon the study of the article covering the extinct family in the chapter on Mourning and Funerals in the Yôrô-Ryô of Japan, which was not touched upon in the previous article. It also treats the widow's right of inheritance among various peoples starting with the right of the wife of the deceased eldest son in Ancient Korea.
  • 史学雑誌
    1990年 99 巻 12 号 2097-2128
    発行日: 1990/12/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 津田 多賀子
    史学雑誌
    1982年 91 巻 12 号 1787-1819,1906-
    発行日: 1982/12/20
    公開日: 2017/11/29
    ジャーナル フリー
    This article deals with the establishment of Japan's Far Eastern policy (especially toward Korea) in 1880s, which was one of the most important problems for the Japanese Government of those days. Many studies have chiefly analysed this policy only through the relation among China, Korea and Japan. But, in reality, Japan's policy was intensely influenced by the Great Powers' attiude towards the Far East, and was established under the complex diplomatic relations. 1)Japan's interventionism in Korea in 1880 was caused not only by the antagonism between Japan and China since the disposition of the Ryukyu Islands ("琉球処分"), but also accelerated by the fact that the Great Powers, having taken advantage of the Ili incident, had claimed to enter inter diplomatic relations with Korea. Such a policy, on the contrary, made the Great Powers alarmed against Japan. They tried to achieve the rapprochment with China and consented to the suzerainty of China over Korea. 2)On the occasion of the disposition of the First Seoul incident (1882), the Japanese Government could not adopt any positive policy, being ristricted by such diplomatic relations. Even after France's proposal of (a dual) alliance against China in the Sino-French War, the Japanese Government did not yet modify its policy. As it seemed that the invasion to China became inevitable, the Japanese Government recklessly launched the Second Seoul incident (1884), forecasting that the victory of France would bring the diplomatic relations disadvantageous to Japan in the Far East. The Japanese Government had to conclude a Treaty with China ("天津条約"), and lost the Great Powers' support for its Korean policy. 3)After the enforcement of the Treaty, England and Germany supported China's hegemony over Korea. The isolated Japanese Government, in the case of the Port Hamilton incident, suggested to China a joint control over Korea, but this proposal was refused. However this incident revealed the confrontation between England and Russia. The Japanese Government, intervening in the power policy of the Great Powers, established a new national aim to be a world power, and started in the full-scale expansion of armaments.
  • 崔 柏
    民族學研究
    1979年 44 巻 2 号 160-167
    発行日: 1979/09/30
    公開日: 2018/03/27
    ジャーナル フリー
    This study shows that the transformation of Korean village structure from a scattered type to a concentrated one could be attributed largely to a government program which was formulated during the first year of King Sukchon' reign to reform every neighborhood by the unit of five adjoining families in every village. (五家統制).Under the system, each neighborhood of five families was maintained as the lowest administrative unit during the Yi Dynasty mainly to serve the dual purposes of functioning as an autonomous part of village and as an auxiliary organ of the state, helping the government in collecting levies and keeping public order and peace. The Ogatongje we find in the history of Korea is a kind of social system, under which a neighborhood in every village was formed of five adjoining families for the purpose of mutual support and vigilance. It had characters of autonomous community of natural villages and was instituted and maintained for a long period of time under the Yi Dynasty. This study chiefly deals with the historical background that had necessitated the rigid enforcement of the system throughout the country, explains details of the 21-Point Program of the Ogatongje that was issued by King Sukchong in 1675, and also tries to describe in what intensity and to what extent each of the 21-Points was applied in the actual en-forcement of the system, comparing each one with another. The materials based on are those family registry cards which had been prepared on families resident in the areas of Songdong.ni and Yongnak-ni, Daejonghyon, Cheju-do (済州島 大静県,城東里,永楽里) , during more than 100 years from 1798 to 1908. According to the above materials, a neighborhood was formed by the unit of five families and was headed by a chief whose main job was to chek each family against its registry card. Each card was so prepared as to show evey member of individual family, indicating, in the case of family head, his social status, name, age, and sexagesimals (干支). Next, Bon (patrilineal origin) was entered. This was then followed by the names and social status of his father, grand-father, great-grand-father, and maternal grand-father-a four progenitor system to indicate the descent of each family. However, this four-progenitor system was limited to the family or household head and his spouse only within the family. Other family members were indicated just as members (siksol 食卒) , along with their social status, names, ages, and sexagesimals. For names of members, however, only his given name was entered for each male member, but only the surname was entered in the case of each female member. This differenec in the method of recording names can be, on the one hand, attributed to the Confucian concept of giving more importance to the males than to female but, on the other hand, it can be also that the basic purpose of instituting the Ogatong System was to mobilize conscripted labor for the state, and thus, the male members (who are the prime source of labor) were recorded differently so as to identify them easily. The Ogatong System was basically instituted for the efficient control of people. Therefore, it was inevitable that the system was rigorously enforced without any discrimination whatsoever. The neighborhood reformation was so designed, in principle, as to establish each township (myun 面) along the existing boundaries of natural villages. It was not permitted for any family to move its residence from one place to another. However, there were observed many instances in which many families moved their residences in spite of the proscription.
  • 戦後日本の国際政治学
    臼井 勝美, 安岡 昭男, 池井 優, 波多野 澄雄, 増田 弘, 宇野 重昭, 横山 宏章, 中見 立夫, 植田 隆子, 佐々木 雄太, 油井 大三郎, 福田 茂夫, 草間 秀三郎, 佐藤 信一
    国際政治
    1979年 1979 巻 61-62 号 2-107,L4
    発行日: 1979/05/25
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The Japan Association of International Relations, which was established in 1956, considers one of its main objectives to contribute to the progress of the study of the history of international relations, in paticular to research into the history of Japanese diplomacy. Japan's Road to the Pacific War is a representative example of what can be done by the joint endeavour of this association.
    We would like to point out, as a specific characteristics of recent research on the history of international relations, firstly, a tendency to remove the limitations which are encountered by a study of so called “diplomatic history” in isolation from everything else.
    We would like to examine the change from the move traditional approaches, which have emphasized only bilateral or multilateral relations between states, to the more modern, original approaches. The interest of researchers will be to cover a wide area of historical phenomena, such as the political decision-making process, public opinion, economic pressure groups and the process of communication amongst other things.
    The second characteristic has been the flowering of collaborative reserch between Japanese and foreign scholars, and we are now receiving the excellent results of their labours. For instance, the conference at Lake Kawaguchi in 1969, the result of which was, “The history of Japanese-American Relations, 1931-41” is a representative example of this trend. However, it is regrettable that the participants in these collaborative research projects have been mainly limited to Japanese and American scholars. It is to be hoped that, in future, there will be further opportunities for collaborative research and conferences not only with American scholars, but also with scholars from China, England, Korea, the Soviet Union and South East Asia.
    We hope the future tendency of research will be for the themes of the role and limitation of the individual in international affairs, as well as the problem of individual responsibility, to become the common interest of scholars.
    We hope that, in future, the increasing variety of scholarship will not become merely scattered and diffused.
  • 塚本 孝
    法政論叢
    2013年 50 巻 1 号 146-
    発行日: 2013年
    公開日: 2017/11/01
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top